<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" ><generator uri="https://jekyllrb.com/" version="4.1.1">Jekyll</generator><link href="https://run.wxm.be/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" /><link href="https://run.wxm.be/" rel="alternate" type="text/html" /><updated>2026-05-08T01:45:38+00:00</updated><id>https://run.wxm.be/feed.xml</id><title type="html">run</title><subtitle>Anything that I find interesting enough to relate to my running.
</subtitle><author><name>Ward Muylaert</name></author><entry><title type="html">Broad Street Run</title><link href="https://run.wxm.be/2026/05/03/broad-street-run.html" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="Broad Street Run" /><published>2026-05-03T20:00:00+00:00</published><updated>2026-05-03T20:00:00+00:00</updated><id>https://run.wxm.be/2026/05/03/broad-street-run</id><content type="html" xml:base="https://run.wxm.be/2026/05/03/broad-street-run.html"><![CDATA[<p>I had signed up to Philadelphia’s “Broad Street Run”, a 10 mile race running
straight along Broad Street, on a bit of a whim. Locally, the race is iconic,
attracting forty thousand people. I figured I should get around to actually
running it as part of my integration. I was giving more serious thoughts about
getting a good training block in for it come February and planning to have a
decent eight week block after the <a href="/2026/03/07/prtc-indoor-3000.html" title="PRTC 3000m (7 Mar 2026)">PRTC 3000m indoor</a> early March.</p>

<p>However, I had gotten a bit injured right before that 3000m race, then managed
to make things worse the week after the race (though, surprisingly, seemingly
not during that race). That injury messed up training for Broad Street, but I
was going to run it regardless, even if it were to end up a slower jog.</p>

<h2 id="training">Training</h2>

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th style="text-align: right">Week</th>
      <th style="text-align: right">Dist (km)</th>
      <th style="text-align: left">Wednesday Workout</th>
      <th style="text-align: left">Detail</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">23 Feb (-9)</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">63</td>
      <td style="text-align: left"><a href="/2026/02/28/moose-fartlek.html" title="Moose Fartlek Description">Moose Fartlek</a></td>
      <td style="text-align: left">Got myself injured on Saturday’s long trail run</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">2 Mar (-8)</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">42</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">-</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">Hip survived <a href="/2026/03/07/prtc-indoor-3000.html" title="PRTC 3000m (7 Mar 2026)">PRTC 3000m</a> and actually felt better after</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">9 Mar (-7)</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">20</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">Repetition</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">Did a rep, got reinjured, and worse so. Walked rest of the week</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">16 Mar (-6)</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">56</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">-</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">Switched to many short jogs, which seemed better for the hip</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">23 Mar (-5)</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">62</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">-</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">Continued previous approach</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">30 Mar (-4)</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">38</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">-</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">Big Bend trip involved a lot of walking, did not dare much running</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">6 Apr (-3)</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">68</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">-</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">Trying to get that volume back again</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">13 Apr (-2)</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">70</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">-</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">Beginning to feel more secure again</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">20 Apr (-1)</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">70</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">LT</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">A careful 2×2 km on the track. Wanted a feel for the 1h 10 mile pace</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">27 Apr</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">65</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">LT</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">Another 2×2 km on the track, same reason. Distance includes the race</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

<p>I’m starting this story from when things went to shit. While doing a long run
on the Horse Shoe Trail on 28 Feb, I fell. I lost a bit of my ear and, worse,
hurt my hip. I skipped some runs, made those I still did a lot easier, then
showed up for the 3000 metre race I had the week after. In the warmup, my hip
worried me still, I was ready to call it quits immediately, but once the race
started, my hip felt fine. After the race, my hip even felt better than it had
all week. Confused, but happy.</p>

<p>Thinking things were OK again, I planned a workout on Wednesday. In the first
rep, my hip immediately said nop. Things felt worse than they had before and
that continued for a while. I switched to walking instead for the rest of the
week.</p>

<p>The week after, I tried out jogs on many days. As long as I did not run too
long, my hip seemed to hold up. I also did these on the nearby rail trail, to
keep them flat and easy. Yes, in retrospect, maybe I should have just taken
more days off. It is so much harder to decide in the moment though. And thus I
continued that many jogs approach for another week. I just wanted to run.</p>

<p>The week after that, the week of 30 March, we had a Texas trip planned. This
involved a lot more walking, especially once we got to Big Bend National Park,
so I ran a lot less. That gap in training I had already planned for though.</p>

<p>Once back home, I went back to building my base back to “normal”, i.e., the
70 km per week that I had reached prior to breaking myself. I did make a
change. Before, I had been spreading the 70 km out over five days and, wanting
to have fun weekend long runs, threw too much distance at my long runs: up to
25 km. In my less desperate-for-running times, I would have been the first one
to say that with only 70 km in a week, you should not bother with a long run
over about 18 km. So I listened to old self (really, to JD) and I now spread
the 70 km out over six days while aiming for a 16–18 km long run. I am thinking
I will keep it that way for a while after the race too.</p>

<p>Finally, the week before race week, I wanted to actually try some faster
running again. No hope remained for the time I had originally filled in for
seeding (58:15), but, being a sucker for round numbers, I decided I should
still aim for sub 60 minutes least. Sixty minutes at race pace tends to be
about what gets suggested for “Lactate Threshold” (LT / T) kind of workouts.
You see where I’m going with this. I just did some T work at the pace that
would get me to the finish in one hour (3:43.6 per km). Did 2×2 km of it on the
track because I wanted to get the exact right feel and because I wanted the
flat stability for my hip just in case. It felt… fine? I did the same workout
again the week of the race. I had not slept anywhere near enough, but got
through it on grit. That gave me even less confidence in actually managing to
hold the pace on race day. Oops.</p>

<h2 id="goal-and-strategy">Goal and Strategy</h2>

<p>As I said, originally I had filled in 58:15. It seemed like a good goal going
by my <a href="/2025/11/07/prtc-5000.html" title="PRTC 5000m (7 Nov 2025)">5000m in November</a> and is supposedly equivalent to just about
a sub-17 5000m. Again, I’m a sucker for round numbers to aim for. Anyway, that
was out the window.</p>

<p>Instead, I was just going to aim for the hour (well, for 59:59), at a pace of
3:43.6 per kilometre. Do that for the first maybe five km, see what my heart
rate is at, adjust for more speed from there if heart rate is too low. If my
heart rate was too high by that point, the plan was to just hold on to the pace
anyway and live with the potential crash and burn.</p>

<h2 id="pre-race">Pre-Race</h2>

<p>Ugh.</p>

<p>With my goals and hopes out the window, I had been ignoring the logistics until
the week of the race. Not that I could have changed much about them, but boy
was that annoying to think about. American races start pretty early compared to
Belgian ones. This one was poised to start at 7:00 in the morning. From where
we live in the suburbs, there was no train option to get to the start early
enough. Instead, my two options were a last minute $200+ hotel room or waking
up really early, driving to the parking lot near the finish line, and taking
the metro up to the start line (the race is point to point along Broad Street).
I was tempted, but decided not to spend that money.</p>

<p>Thus the night before, I started my evening routine by like 20:00. Took some
melatonin, went to lie in bed, read the book I had been reading. All the usual
approaches to when I have trouble falling asleep. To my surprise, that actually
worked somewhat. I don’t know exactly when I fell asleep, but I think I might
have even gotten six hours of sleep.</p>

<p>My alarm went off at 4:20. Good thing I’m pretty good at immediately getting
out of bed most of the time. I got going with the usual morning routine, but
with more purpose than usual. I had three bites of the pasts leftovers from the
night before. I had a banana. My wife (who was nice enough to tag along for
this madness) and I headed out the door at 4:40. The drive to the parking lot
took about 50 mins, we arrived by 5:30 or so. I changed into my running gear,
threw a sweater over, was too cold, but we made our way to the metro station
that was right there. Got to the metro platform by about 5:38–39 (I remember
looking at the clock too often, waiting for a metro to show up), waited five
minutes for the express train to arrive, got in like sardines, and after some
more delay we were on our way. The express line still stopped a few more times
and every time our idea of being in there like sardines got hit by a “it can
always be worse”. By the end of the 30–40 minute ordeal, I was sweating a
little from the heat of the mass of people in that cart. Dicht bijeen is warm.</p>

<p>We arrived at the start area with about 40 minutes till the start. Walked to
the toilets. There were a lot, but the lining up was a bit disorganized, you
had to kind of guess which line belonged to what number of toilets. Anyway,
that was uneventful and we headed to my corral. Everyone under 62 minutes seed
time got in the red corral, right behind the elites. I did not really have time
to jog around for a warm up (and did not want the mess of figuring out a good
spot nearby to even try that), so I made do with swinging legs, some running in
place, some jumping up and down. Not ideal, but I also was not really worried
about it? It helps that I did not expect a PR here.</p>

<h2 id="race">Race</h2>

<p>The start was given a bit abruptly and off we were. I started off partly by
feel and partly by glancing at the watch. Early on, there is not much trust you
can put in that GPS time reading anyway. The pace felt right though. Once the
GPS caught on, my feeling was confirmed. I assumed the people around me must
also be aiming for an hour and we all just stuck around that same pace.
Specifically, I tried to stay near a guy that, going by his jersey, was part of
the club that organised my previous two track races. They have some speedy boys
and girls and I had noticed a lot of their shirts in the start corral.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Watch splits kilometres one and two, rounded to the second: 3:43, 3:43</p>
</blockquote>

<figure>
  <img src="/assets/img/20260503-broadstreetrun/1.first-few-100.avif" alt="Always too much energy early on." loading="lazy" />
  <figcaption>Always too much energy early on.</figcaption>
</figure>

<p>Pretty much bang on. After those two first kilometres though, I realise that my
heart rate is not going up to where it should. Historically, my
LT-aka-one-hour-race-pace heart rate is around 170–173. My watch said my heart
rate was around 155. At that point I decided to let the reins go. Speed up by
feel, keep an eye on the heart rate, and see what happens. Finishing in an hour
while running an entire race in the high 150s would not have sparked joy.</p>

<p>Anyway, I started blasting.</p>

<p>I picked up the pace and I picked off people. Always a little worrying when you
suddenly go faster than most people around you, but hey, I had the idea in my
head now. Things felt fine, running fast is fun.</p>

<p>By about halfway, I did get the first thoughts of “you know, letting the body
relax could be fun too”. We ignore those feelings.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Kilometres 3–9: 3:34, 3:33, 3:32, 3:36, 3:33, 3:33, 3:34</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Since the race is a straight line, you see the city hall from quite far away
already. A little over halfway, at about 9 km, you finally reach it. With it,
you also reach the only four turns as you have to go around it. They are not
tight turns though, so you can just keep it rolling.</p>

<figure>
  <img src="/assets/img/20260503-broadstreetrun/2.city-hall.avif" alt="Right past the city hall makes for pretty pictures." loading="lazy" />
  <figcaption>Right past the city hall makes for pretty pictures.</figcaption>
</figure>

<p>Just a little past the city hall, I spot my wife’s bright yellow jacket. She
yells at me I’m doing great. I had told her about the one hour goal, naturally,
so she knew I was ahead of schedule.</p>

<p>And ahead I was. The race provided mile markers and a (gun) timer at every one
of them. For a race where you know you need to run just faster than six minutes
per mile, that works out to some easy math. I saw my time get further and
further ahead of every next multiple of six. I was over a minute ahead of
schedule, so projected finish of 58:xx. I would have to implode pretty badly
for sub 60 to fail at this point.</p>

<p>A few kilometre later, I realise I have to reign myself in some, I need to slow
down. While my heart rate is still just hovering around 163–165, i.e., lower
than I would expect, I feel pretty sure I cannot keep up the pace I was
running. I don’t worry about it though. Accept faith, see if there is someone I
can follow for a while. I tell myself one thing though: I can’t let myself go
slower than 3:43.6, the pace I had originally had in mind for the entire race.
I am on track for 58:xx and I want to keep it that way.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Kilometres 10–13: 3:37, 3:38, 3:42, 3:42</p>
</blockquote>

<p>A lot of this stretch is spent thinking “right, follow that person” … “OK, I
can’t really follow them right now” … “Well, they’re also not pulling away very
far, so keep them vaguely in sight”. Rinse and repeat. It keeps my mind
occupied though. I just want to make sure I keep going. I also already am
thinking about when to start pushing to the finish. Last 800m or so sounds
good.</p>

<p>Those last bits, there’s actually a slight double bend in the road. Everyone
else seems to be sticking to the lanes painted on the road, I aim for what I
think is the straighter line. I’m also pushing a bit again, but there’s not
much to push.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Kilometres 14–16.1: 3:40, 3:41, 3:37+31</p>
</blockquote>

<h2 id="results">Results</h2>

<p><a href="https://results2.xacte.com/#/e/2630/searchable">Official results</a> and <a href="https://www.strava.com/activities/18359128202">my own GPS</a>.</p>

<p>My official splits (chip time), compared to the goal pace.</p>

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th style="text-align: left">Split</th>
      <th style="text-align: right">Time</th>
      <th style="text-align: right">Leg</th>
      <th style="text-align: right">Pace/km</th>
      <th style="text-align: right">Rank</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: left">3 mi</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">17:32 (-28)</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">17:32 (-28)</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">3:38</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">277</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: left">5 mi</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">29:04 (-56)</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">11:32 (-28)</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">3:35</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">252</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: left">7 mi</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">40:45 (-75)</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">11:41 (-19)</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">3:38</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">257</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: left">10 mi</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">58:28 (-92)</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">17:43 (-17)</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">3:40</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">268</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

<p>Honestly, can’t complain. Sure, the course helps (slight net downhill, one
direction). Since I was still already going to be happy with sub 60 today,
going faster makes me happier still. Technically this is a PR since it is only
the second 10 mile race I have ever run. In reality, the pace of my half
marathon PR was a 57:06, without even accounting for being able to run it
faster if there is no expectation of another five km tacked on after it. Ah, to
be in that shape again.</p>

<p>Right past the finish line, a guy walks up to me and asks me about my Belgian
themed shirt. Turns out he is a Belgian too. He saw my singlet during the race
and it motivated him to beat me. He managed to, he finished nine seconds ahead
of me. We chatted for a bit, commiserating the lack of talking Dutch in our
respective areas.</p>

<p>After that, I walked to a shuttle that would bring runners back to the nearby
parking lot. By the time I reached the shuttle, I felt like the parking lot was
not too far any more anyway and I just walked the rest of the way.</p>

<h2 id="future">Future</h2>

<p>I think my main takeaway from this race is my body might have been lacking in
endurance and my mind in the will to push through the pain. That will be a
matter of running more again and running harder more often again, both in
workout settings as in race settings. Time will tell whether I manage.</p>

<p>As for actual future plans, I don’t really know. Past two months distracted me
some from even looking ahead much. I’m thinking I’ll look for a race in fall
just to keep something on the horizon. Probably should do some smaller stuff
sooner.</p>

<p>In the near future I want to get my consistency back. I’m thinking along the
two obvious fronts here: distance per week and workouts. I think my distance
per week will be back at 70 km per week again easily enough once the week of
taking it easier post race is past. I want to finally push towards 80 km again.
Really I want to push beyond that, but given my recent history I will take the
build up there nice and slow. In terms of workouts I will see what makes sense,
but I think I will start with just some more LT work, it feels less destructive
to play around with. I really do like “Repetition”, i.e., 200s and 400s,
though, so who knows.</p>]]></content><author><name>Ward Muylaert</name></author><category term="report" /><category term="road" /><category term="length:16093" /><summary type="html"><![CDATA[I had signed up to Philadelphia’s “Broad Street Run”, a 10 mile race running straight along Broad Street, on a bit of a whim. Locally, the race is iconic, attracting forty thousand people. I figured I should get around to actually running it as part of my integration. I was giving more serious thoughts about getting a good training block in for it come February and planning to have a decent eight week block after the PRTC 3000m indoor early March.]]></summary></entry><entry><title type="html">PRTC Indoor Classic 3000m</title><link href="https://run.wxm.be/2026/03/07/prtc-indoor-3000.html" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="PRTC Indoor Classic 3000m" /><published>2026-03-07T20:00:00+00:00</published><updated>2026-03-07T20:00:00+00:00</updated><id>https://run.wxm.be/2026/03/07/prtc-indoor-3000</id><content type="html" xml:base="https://run.wxm.be/2026/03/07/prtc-indoor-3000.html"><![CDATA[<p>Right after my <a href="/2025/11/07/prtc-5000.html" title="PRTC 5000m (7 Nov 2025)">5000m</a> back in November, I was told the organising
club holds a yearly indoor track event early March. I immediately was pretty
sure I would take part, barring any setbacks from some travel that was to
follow later in November and December. I survived those and set my sights on
this 3000m.</p>

<h2 id="training">Training</h2>

<p>I kept my training approach pretty much the same as what I was doing (and as
described in that <a href="/2025/11/07/prtc-5000.html" title="PRTC 5000m (7 Nov 2025)">previous race report</a>). I don’t quite trust my
body to handle much more still, so I am keeping any building <em>slow</em>. What that
amounts to most weeks is: five days of running with one run workout day and one
long run day, walking for about 1h each on the two other days. For the
workouts, I think I most like the “Repetition” work as described in JD (i.e.,
200s and 400s at 1500m–mile race pace), but I switched it up enough because I
need improvements a bit everywhere. In a regular week, the spread is as
follows, but I adjust based on life.</p>

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th style="text-align: left">Day</th>
      <th style="text-align: left">What</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: left">Mon</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">Walk</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: left">Tue</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">Jog</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: left">Wed</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">Workout</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: left">Thu</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">Walk</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: left">Fri</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">Run</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: left">Sat</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">Jog</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: left">Sun</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">Long run</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

<p>Over the past months I also jumped up to 70 km per week, which is not a huge
increase by any means, but I just want to continue running consistently, so,
again, abundance of caution. Long runs are 21–25 km. Workout days 12–13 km.
Rest just sort of fills in to get to a distance. Here’s an overview of how the
weeks were filled in. Paces were mostly determined based on that previous race,
but slightly faster, based on the big kick I still had at the end.</p>

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th style="text-align: right">Week</th>
      <th style="text-align: right">Distance (km)</th>
      <th style="text-align: left">Workout Type</th>
      <th style="text-align: left">Detail</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">10 Nov (-16)</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">62</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">Repetition</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">3×(4×200) (goal: 38.5s/200m, jog 200m recovery, 400m between sets)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">17 Nov (-15)</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">20</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">-</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">Bad sleep and walking from travel ⇒ easier running</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">24 Nov (-14)</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">34</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">-</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">Walking from travel still</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">1 Dec (-13)</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">22</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">-</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">Travel and getting sick right after</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">8 Dec (-12)</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">60</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">-</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">Did not want to do a workout yet due to previous</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">15 Dec (-11)</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">60</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">-</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">First load of snow blocking everything, followed by flying to Belgium</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">22 Dec (-10)</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">61</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">-</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">Still jetlagged + Christmas + flying back</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">29 Dec (-9)</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">61</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">-</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">Giving myself an extra no workout week to get through New Year</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">5 Jan (-8)</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">64</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">Repetition</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">3×(4×200) (goal: 38.5s/200m, jog 200m recovery, 400m between sets)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">12 Jan (-7)</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">68</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">Repetition</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">3×(4×200) (goal: 38.5s/200m, jog 200m recovery, 400m between sets)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">19 Jan (-6)</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">70</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">LT</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">3×2 km (goal: 3:45/km, but couldn’t hit it at all, 2 min jogs)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">26 Jan (-5)</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">57</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">-</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">Down week cause it got <em>cold</em> (and snow everywhere), then knee also acted up</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">2 Feb (-4)</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">70</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">LT</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">10 min, 11 min. On treadmill so aimed for HR</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">9 Feb (-3)</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">70</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">LT</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">3×2 km (goal: 3:45/km, ended up a little slower, 2 min jogs)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">16 Feb (-2)</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">70</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">VO2max</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">4×1 km (goal: 3:25–3:30/km, reality more 3:35s)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">23 Feb (-1)</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">63</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">LT/VO2max</td>
      <td style="text-align: left"><a href="/2026/02/28/moose-fartlek.html" title="Moose Fartlek Description">Moose fartlek</a></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">2 Mar</td>
      <td style="text-align: right"> </td>
      <td style="text-align: left">This race</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">3000m</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

<p>I did not realise how quite interrupted this block has been in terms of
workouts. Admittedly, I am still in the “as long as I get my distance in” camp.
I just want to <em>run</em>. If there are constraints, workouts are usually the first
thing to get thrown out.</p>

<p>As expected, the travelling messed up my training. Jetlag in all directions,
walking making me worried about how much I should even be running. This time
was just a matter of holding on to some consistency and I knew that was going
to be the case heading in.</p>

<p>After that I tried to get back in a workout flow, but the weather decided
differently. It snowed a decent amount the weekend of 17–18 Jan. Snow remained
through the following week, so I could not use the track. I replaced my
Repetition workout with an LT around some neighbourhood block in the area and
promptly failed to hit pace targets at all. That following weekend of 24–25 Jan
it got <em>cold</em> (-13C high that Saturday) and it snowed <em>a lot</em>. Then the really
bad cold remained for an entire week. I planned in a down week to avoid it and
eventually moved to my wife’s gym’s treadmill because the cold seemed to be
flaring up my knee again. I wonder if that is how I reinjured the knee last
winter, that also happened in the cold as I remember hopping over snow (and it
hurting right after that hop). For the rest of my outdoor runs up till about 4C
or 5C, I ended up wearing thermal underwear under my tights. I wanted to make
completely sure that my muscles and tendons could stay warm enough. The week of
2 Feb, some days got warmer (-2C high), but a lot of the week dropped back down
to the too cold temps and I did a treadmill LT workout. Week of 9 Feb it got a
little warmer again (still freezing all the time), so I ended up using the
local rail trail for an LT workout.</p>

<p>Week of 16 Feb, I thought to check out the track, the snow was melting a little
bit. The track disagreed. Somebody had cleaned parts of lane 2 and parts of
lane 3. I had preferred lane 1 because I wanted to do VO2max workouts, I like
my 1 km to be precise. Because things had begun slowly melting, the track was
also very wet. I could feel my shoes did not have enough grip, there were
several minislips on steps throughout the workout. It did not go well, but I
had my excuse ready. That said, I also felt tired all week, so am not surprised
I was off pace. As long as the idea of an effort is there?</p>

<p>It snowed some more that Sunday 15 Feb, so Wednesday last week I went to the
rail trail again and did a <a href="/2026/02/28/moose-fartlek.html" title="Moose Fartlek Description">Moose fartlek</a>. That post says how I
did, but it boils down to a change of pace workout of 15 minutes at LT, 5
minutes at VO2max. I am not sure where exactly I sat for this race, but I felt
things would go alright enough.</p>

<p>Then came Saturday last week.</p>

<p>The snow had been melting a bunch and I thought to finally make some progress
again on my running of the entire Horse Shoe Trail. Nature trails here, and the
HST in particular, are very rocky. You have to pay attention when you run them.
I am not too bad at that in the ups and downs (of which there are a lot). I get
complacent when the terrain flattens out a little bit and you feel like you can
pick up some speed. Anyway. I got my foot hooked on one rock and couldn’t keep
my balance. Fell to the ground, hit my head on a rock, giving me a deep cut in
my ear (turns out ears can bleed a bit), scrape on my knee, scrapes on my arm.
All that on the right side of my body. In retrospect, I think my left hip also
felt a little bit off right after the fall, but I thought nothing of it at the
time. After I managed to stop the ear from bleeding, I finished my long run.</p>

<p>My left hip got really sore later that day. Both on the lateral side between
the bony parts (very sore) as on the front side around where your front thigh
muscle connects, I think (sore, less than the side). Oops. All the scrapes I
could ignore, but this soreness was a bit too much. I walked the two days after
and even that was unpleasant the first km or two. Tuesday through Friday I did
daily jogs (6–8 km) and went to the rail trail to avoid elevation or anything
that might further upset the hip. It was slowly healing, but had me worried,
especially for Saturday, race day.</p>

<p>On top of all that, the cut in my ear made it so I only dared to sleep on my
left side, the painful hip side. A wonderful combo. Sleep was not good this
week.</p>

<h2 id="goal-and-strategy">Goal and Strategy</h2>

<p>So back when I signed up, I had filled in 9:45 (3:15/km, 39 seconds per 200m
lap) as seed time. It was a bit ambitious when I filled it in, but I thought I
might be able to put it together with a good race day. After the week I had, I
was going to be glad to finish the entire distance. I had already paid money,
soooo I figured I would still just show up and hope for the best. As it turns
out, my seed time was right at one of the cutoffs they used to decide the
heats. I was placed in a heat with 21 other people that all had filled in a
seed time of at least 5 seconds faster than I had, and often more than that. If
that had not been the case, maybe I would have changed my race planning, but
now I figured just aim for that seed time and hope. I did not want to run way
slower than everyone right from the getgo.</p>

<h2 id="pre-race">Pre-Race</h2>

<p>Woke up at 7:00 to get ready, 3000m heats were to start at 10:00, I was heat 3.
Some oatmeal, some caffeine, toilet use. Had also packed my Vaporflys as my
track shoes are in Belgium. I am sure it would look a bit silly on a track, but
then those shoes just always look silly. Left at 8:00 to drive into
Philadelphia. Arrived at the track a little past 9:00 since we parked a decent
walk away from the track; it would be easier for our planning for the rest of
the day, i.e., meandering, eating, and drinking in Philadelphia. Checked in,
got my sticker bib, got ready, started jogging the track a bit. Did not like
how the banked corners felt on my hip, but thought that would be fine at higher
speeds, maybe. Did a lot of leg swinging inbetween jogging, hoping to activate
all the hip muscles. Not sure whether I achieved anything with it besides
noticing that there’s actually still quite some soreness/pain closer to the
edges of my range of motion. How’s that for a vote of confidence. Fuck it, I
was here, let’s just get on with it.</p>

<p>Saw 60 year old <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelle_Rohl" title="Michelle Rohl Wikipedia Page">Michelle Rohl</a> break the age group world record
with a 10:28 3000m. Damn.</p>

<p>And after that, it was my heat’s turn.</p>

<h2 id="race">Race</h2>

<figure>
  <img src="/assets/img/20260307-prtc3000/0.start.avif" alt="Lined up at the staggered start, I am on the right side in the closest row of runners." loading="lazy" />
  <figcaption>Lined up at the staggered start, I am on the right side in the closest row of runners.</figcaption>
</figure>

<p>Being the slowest seed, I start on the outside of the track. I’m used to that
by now. The start gun caught me a little bit by surprise. In my Belgian track
races a jury member would usually walk by, checking everyone’s feet aren’t on
the line right before the gun. Here they saw it from the side and just shot the
gun. Feel like I lost half a second right there with my slow reaction time.
Anyway, that gave me the opportunity to immediately cut to the inner lane. I
knew I was going to be last and it seems I was starting out that way.</p>

<p>I had half a mind of trying to hang with the second to last group, but I think
I figured out pretty quickly that that was not going to be a good idea. Going
by the splits it seems I stayed within half a second for 2 laps (400m total).
0.8 seconds by lap 3, 1.7 seconds by lap 4. Ye, this was going to be a time
trial. Also yay for these detailed splits provided by the organization.</p>

<figure>
  <img src="/assets/img/20260307-prtc3000/1.lap2or3.avif" alt="Lap two or three, realizing I will not be sticking with the rest of the field." loading="lazy" />
  <figcaption>Lap two or three, realizing I will not be sticking with the rest of the field.</figcaption>
</figure>

<p>Somewhere in those first few laps, the banked corner almost made me fall into
infield. I wonder if that’s more common if you’re going slower. Made some weird
hand movements there to keep me in.</p>

<p>Through 1 km I was actually a little too fast: 3:13.16. However, I felt that
that was not going to last. Laps had been slowing down, breathing had become
more laborious. I did not really see my splits, but I knew it was not going
right.</p>

<p>For the 2 km mark, I did know what time I had to be at (6:30). Actual time was
6:34.69. Nice, not too far off, but I knew I was running off pace and that I
was not going to manage to get back up speed again. So that delta was only
going to grow.</p>

<p>With exactly two laps to go, the first guy lapped me. Going by the seed times,
I had also expected that, the spread had been more than what I was hoping to
run per lap. Because it was expected, it was in no way demoralizing. Some more
people followed that first takeover. I stayed in lane 1, but also tried to make
sure I did not take up too much room so went a bit too close to the inside.
Again almost fell to the infield, had to keep my balance through two left steps
before I saved it.</p>

<p>Anyway, I just tried to keep up my own pace somewhat and brought it home.</p>

<figure>
  <img src="/assets/img/20260307-prtc3000/2.surviving.avif" alt="Focused on just surviving." loading="lazy" />
  <figcaption>Focused on just surviving.</figcaption>
</figure>

<h2 id="results">Results</h2>

<p>Official result: 9:59.23. Sub-10 still, at least? Last in my heat by almost
17 seconds. If I had been just on the other side of the cutoff, I would have
had a battle for first in the slower heat (and going by the actual time I would
have lost, though a battle has a way of pushing me harder). Of the
55 participants across the open 3000m heats, I was 34th. There was also a high
performers event, but that is not included in that listing. Those add 11 women
(4 faster than me) and 11 men (all faster than me), making me 49th of 77.</p>

<p>The results also provide detailed splits (they provide three numbers past the
comma, I include one). I compare the offset to my goal of 39s per 200m, 9:45
for the 3000m.</p>

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th style="text-align: right">Lap</th>
      <th style="text-align: right">Lap Time</th>
      <th style="text-align: right">Offset</th>
      <th style="text-align: right">Time</th>
      <th style="text-align: right">Offset</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">1</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">39.2</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">+0.2</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">39.2</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">+0.2</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">2</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">38.2</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">-0.8</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">1:17.3</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">-0.7</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">3</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">38.3</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">-0.7</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">1:55.7</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">-1.3</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">4</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">38.6</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">-0.4</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">2:34.3</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">-1.7</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">5</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">38.9</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">-0.1</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">3:13.2</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">-1.8</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">6</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">40.0</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">+1.0</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">3:53.1</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">-0.9</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">7</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">40.0</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">+1.0</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">4:33.1</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">+0.1</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">8</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">39.8</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">+0.8</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">5:12.9</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">+0.9</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">9</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">40.7</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">+1.7</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">5:53.6</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">+2.6</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">10</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">41.1</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">+2.1</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">6:34.7</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">+4.7</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">11</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">41.2</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">+2.2</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">7:15.9</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">+6.9</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">12</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">41.4</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">+2.4</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">7:57.3</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">+9.3</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">13</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">40.9</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">+1.9</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">8:38.2</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">+11.2</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">14</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">40.9</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">+1.9</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">9:19.1</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">+13.1</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">15</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">40.2</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">+1.2</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">9:59.2</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">+14.2</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

<p>It is not what I wanted, but oh well. After the week I have had, I am happy to
just finish the race without feeling my hip. Looking at equivalences, it is
also definitely better than my time at <a href="/2025/11/07/prtc-5000.html" title="PRTC 5000m (7 Nov 2025)">that 5000m in November</a> where
I ran 17:42. This 3000m time translates to about 17:17 over 5000m. As I look
that up, I also realise that 9:45 would be equivalent with just a little under
17 minutes. Maybe that is why I had originally chosen it as seed time. Ego.</p>

<p>Anyway, I’ll take it. I think that actually means a very small speed up of my
workout paces is warranted again. More suffering, here I come.</p>

<p>As an aside, I had a nasty track hack rest of the day. My throat did not like
that indoor track race.</p>

<h2 id="future">Future</h2>

<p>I signed up for <a href="https://www.broadstreetrun.com/" title="Independence Blue Cross Broad Street Run">Broad Street Run</a>, a 10 mile race on 3 May in
Philadelphia which, as far as I can tell, is literally just running one long
street straight down from north to south. Yay, grids. I forgot what I filled in
as seed time there. That race should be busy enough that I can just adjust what
I think I am capable of running without being worried I will look like a fool.</p>

<p>Assuming this hip thing is past me, I’m hoping for a good eight week block. The
original plan from here on out was three up weeks, a down week, three up weeks,
race week. I am now in the process of planning a national park trip and,
coincidentally, that seems to be overlapping with the down week. So the down
week might end up being an extra-down week to accommodate for the walking that
will no doubt happen. I do have to actually still work out the details of that
plan, so I best get on that soon enough.</p>

<p>After Broad Street, I do not have any idea of a plan yet.</p>]]></content><author><name>Ward Muylaert</name></author><category term="report" /><category term="track" /><category term="indoor" /><category term="length:3000" /><summary type="html"><![CDATA[Right after my 5000m back in November, I was told the organising club holds a yearly indoor track event early March. I immediately was pretty sure I would take part, barring any setbacks from some travel that was to follow later in November and December. I survived those and set my sights on this 3000m.]]></summary></entry><entry><title type="html">Moose Fartlek</title><link href="https://run.wxm.be/2026/02/28/moose-fartlek.html" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="Moose Fartlek" /><published>2026-02-28T09:30:00+00:00</published><updated>2026-02-28T09:30:00+00:00</updated><id>https://run.wxm.be/2026/02/28/moose-fartlek</id><content type="html" xml:base="https://run.wxm.be/2026/02/28/moose-fartlek.html"><![CDATA[<p>After the previous post, I was reminded that I had been meaning to look up the
definition of a “Moose Fartlek”, a running workout I assume was made up by
Julian “Moose” Spence of the <a href="https://insiderunningpodcast.com/">Inside Running Podcast</a>. A quick search
spotted it in <a href="https://insiderunningpodcast.podbean.com/e/223-sa-3000m-state-champs-moose-fartlek/" title="Inside Running Podcast, Episode 223: SA 3000m State Champs | Moose Fartlek">episode 223</a>, I am mostly copying it here for my own
future reference. A lot of this post is notes from listening to that part of
the episode. Go listen to the source if you are interested.</p>

<h2 id="the-goods">The Goods</h2>

<ul>
  <li>30 minutes total running, non-stop</li>
  <li>Five sets of six minute blocks, where a six minute block consists of
    <ul>
      <li>Three minutes at 10k to half marathon effort</li>
      <li>One minute jog</li>
      <li>One minute at 5k effort</li>
      <li>One minute jog</li>
    </ul>
  </li>
</ul>

<h2 id="notes-from-the-episode">Notes From the Episode</h2>

<ul>
  <li>If you need to build up to it, start with 3 or 4 sets. Can also make the
three minute block be two minutes, or do just 30 seconds at 5k effort. Tinker
with amount or length, not with effort.</li>
  <li>My own note for the 10k to half marathon effort: these are fast people, their
half marathon is under 1h10 at the time of this podcast. For the rest of us,
maybe use time-based instead. Something like race pace if you would be racing
for 30 to 60 minutes. Moose adds that he thinks of them as “feeling a bit
harder than threshold”. I assume that that is like Jack Daniel’s “Threshold”
workout, which is a one hour race effort. Similar remark for the 5k pace, for
them that is a 15 minute effort if that. If you have a 30 minute 5k, maybe
reconsider the pace you are aiming for.</li>
  <li>Also on pace, aim for that 1h effort originally, can always build up to
closer to 10k after giving the workout a try a few times. Or if feeling very
confident, during the workout.</li>
  <li>The three minute blocks should not be that difficult. It’s not too hard, but
enough to feel tough after the fifth rep of it.</li>
  <li>The 5k effort is about changing gears, faster leg turnover, heartrate spike,
get that lactate going.</li>
  <li>Ensure a difference between the 3 minute effort and the 5k effort. First
should feel medium, second should feel hard.</li>
  <li>Jogs are not floating, not supposed to be fast, not a walk either. At the
start they might be 45 seconds per km slower than the three minute effort. By
the end, that might be 1–2 minutes slower. Try to get the heart rate down in
that one minute. The jog after the 5k effort will likely be a lot slower than
the first jog. You will need it.</li>
  <li>Try to do by feel. Don’t show pace on your watch. You don’t need heart rate
either, the intervals are small.</li>
  <li>It’s some threshold running (15 minutes total), mixed in with some VO2max
(5 minutes total).</li>
  <li>Don’t let the 5k speed tempt you into flying into the next three minute
block.</li>
  <li>Last sets should match the first sets, don’t start too hard, don’t finish too
hard.</li>
  <li>Should get to halfway feeling pretty good, doesn’t normally get hard until
fourth or fifth set.</li>
  <li>Put a recovery day before and after.</li>
  <li>Week out from a race, stick to three sets.</li>
</ul>

<h2 id="trying-it-out">Trying It Out</h2>

<p>After looking up the definition, I figured I should actually give it a try
before publishing this post. It had also snowed again and I did not trust the
local running track to be clear for my originally planned track workout. The
rail trail in the area, however, does seem to get cleaned almost immediately
and is a good candidate for a time and feel based workout. So I put the workout
in my watch and gave it a go. For presentation purposes, I give the reps a name
(LT = Lactate Threshold = that one hour effort, VO2max = something around 3–5k
race pace, here 5k) I am used to and removed the jogs.</p>

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th style="text-align: right">Set</th>
      <th style="text-align: left">What</th>
      <th style="text-align: right">Lap km</th>
      <th style="text-align: right">Lap min/km</th>
      <th style="text-align: right">Lap Max HR</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">1</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">LT</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">0.77</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">3:53</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">148</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">1</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">VO2max</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">0.29</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">3:29</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">155</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">2</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">LT</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">0.76</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">3:58</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">153</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">2</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">VO2max</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">0.27</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">3:41</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">154</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">3</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">LT</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">0.80</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">3:46</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">156</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">3</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">VO2max</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">0.28</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">3:34</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">155</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">4</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">LT</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">0.78</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">3:50</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">158</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">4</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">VO2max</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">0.28</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">3:31</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">159</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">5</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">LT</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">0.80</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">3:46</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">159</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">5</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">VO2max</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">0.29</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">3:25</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">158</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

<p>All jogs were give or take 200m on the GPS. Largely 4:40 to 5:00 per km pace,
so in the normal run territory. Nothing like the shuffle I have between reps in
a track workout.</p>

<p>The goal I had in my head beforehand was 3:45/km for the three minute blocks
and 3:25–3:30/km for 5k, based on eyeballing JD’s conversion chart. In the
first set I glanced at my watch rather often, I wanted to get the right feel
going for the workout. I also definitely did not want to way overdo it as
scheduling constraints meant I would be doing a long run two days after this
workout. After that I tried to focus more on the feeling, only glancing at my
watch from time to time for a bit of confirmation.</p>

<p>Quite some of the reps are actually slower than I thought they would turn out
to be based on the watch glancing. It is what it is. It was supposed to be feel
based, so this is something that can improve over time. That said, as suggested
during the episode’s discussion, I did not start feeling a little tired till
the last two sets. Never had that feeling of “come on let it be over” though.
The short reps probably helped, the slightly slower pace maybe did too. I
should note the weather was also great at 5C, no sun, no wind. I added the peak
HR of every lap in the table above. Due to the short reps, I don’t know whether
anything can be concluded from it, but it still stood out to me that it never
went <em>that</em> high. Top end of my GA range is maybe 155.</p>

<p>Next day felt nothing, so it was light enough on the legs, at least the way
that I ended up doing it. If I did it again I would probably try to be a little
bit faster for both “on” reps. I wish I had given this a try earlier on in this
winter, then I would have had a better alternative than the workout I did the
other week on a badly cleaned lane of a snowed in track. Anyway, I will
probably try this one again at some point. Just need to see when I want to fit
it in.</p>

<h2 id="where-to-find-the-explanation">Where To Find the Explanation</h2>

<p>As mentioned, it was in <a href="https://insiderunningpodcast.podbean.com/e/223-sa-3000m-state-champs-moose-fartlek/" title="Inside Running Podcast, Episode 223: SA 3000m State Champs | Moose Fartlek">episode 223</a>. In particular I found it at
timestamps <code class="language-plaintext highlighter-rouge">1:02:50</code> through <code class="language-plaintext highlighter-rouge">1:13:20</code> in that episode.</p>

<p>I did not actually relisten to it, I extracted the relevant block with <code class="language-plaintext highlighter-rouge">ffmpeg</code>
and had it transcribed by a machine learning tool. I wanted to skim through it
and jump back and forth. Text is better for that. I am adding the transcription
here, with some corrections by myself.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Moose you wanted to bring a session to the show this week and obviously to
stroke your own ego, you’ve picked a session that’s named after yourself.</p>

  <p>Well, I actually before I get into it, I just I think people need to
understand the relationship between work and rest and volume and duration a
lot better with their when with their workouts. And I think this sort of
series talking about different workouts and how you might go about changing
them to to specific purposes might might help that because a lot of the time
I see people doing workouts like let’s just say 6 by a K at a certain like
and 60 seconds off they won’t know what effort to go at and so they just go
really hard and smash themselves or then they might do 8 by a K with like it
they don’t understand the difference in the like how how all the those
different variables within a workout are connected. So I think if we go
through a series of them, then they might start be able to plan their own
training a lot better.</p>

  <p>So the first one is, it’s called the moose fartlek. Not sure who came up with
this name, but brilliant, because it is a brilliant workout. So 30 minutes
total running. It’s a workout that can be done for someone training for all
distances. I feel like it’s nice to throw into a marathon block and it’s also
nice as a sort of aerobic workout for a 5k like in a 5k block as well. So the
30 minutes is broken up into five sets of six minutes blocks run
continuously. So, it’s non-stop running for 30 minutes and it’s organized
like this. Five sets of three minutes at 10k to half marathon effort, one
minute jog, then one minute at 5k effort with one minute jog. And so the
jogs, they’re not, it’s not floating. It’s not supposed to be fast. It’s not
a walk. It’s somewhere in the middle if that makes sense. So at the start you
might find that you’re running about oh I’m going to say 45 seconds slower
per k than your 3 minute effort for the jog, but that might end up being a
minute to two minutes slower by the time that you’re finishing the workout,
especially if you’ve gone a bit harder</p>

  <p>and understanding that that pace might not be super accurate because it’s
only a one minute</p>

  <p>like it’s only measuring minutes. Yeah.</p>

  <p>And it and it doesn’t matter really like as long as you’re trying to recover
and get the heart rate down in that one minute.</p>

  <p>Yeah. The idea behind this whole workout is you don’t have pace showing on
your watch.</p>

  <p>It’s run to feel. You don’t even need heart rate showing because the
intervals are quite small that I actually just run this one all to feel. So
it’s 3 minutes at your 10k to half marathon effort, one minute easy, one
minute 5k effort, one minute jog. So the three minute reps are just under
threshold. Like when I say just under threshold, I mean just over just over
threshold in terms of it’s feeling a bit harder than your threshold. runs.
We’re after a sort of, we want you to get in the rhythm. 3 minutes at that
shouldn’t be that difficult. It’s not too hard, but it’s enough to feel tough
after the fifth rep of it. So, you shouldn’t go chasing the feel of of being
cooked at the end of these three minute reps. And then obviously the jog.
Then the 5k effort is about changing gears. So, we want to spike the heart
rate. We want to get the legs turned over into that faster cadence, quicker
ground contact time, like a bit more power. We want to flood the blood with
lactate and then that one minute jog after the 5k effort is probably going to
be a lot slower than the one minute jog after the three minute effort because
you’ll need it. And then you come off that jog back into that steady run
again. So it’s sort of cycles through a few gears in this workout. You get a
bit of a bang for your buck. You get some threshold running. You get some
VO2max stuff as well.</p>

  <p>And is it fair to say, Moose, when you go back to that three minute effort,
you should almost feel like your brakes are on. Like you shouldn’t be working
to hit that effort. It should be like, okay, I’m comfortable here. You’re
still working, but you’re comfortable because you’ve just come off that much
stronger one minute rep.</p>

  <p>Yeah. I want to see a decent difference between the 5k, between the one
minute and the three minute. So, for instance, if I go out there, if I went
out and did this tomorrow, I would do the three minutes at I would hope to
see that it would come out about 3:15s and then the one minutes would be at
about 3 minute pace. So, about 15 seconds for me. But it like to reiterate,
it’s not about pace. There has to be a real change in feel. It has to feel
medium and then it has to feel hard.</p>

  <p>Hey Moose, I got a similar question to what Brady asked because I know every
time I’ve given these type of sessions to people because you run one minute a
lot faster than that 3 minute and then you have a minute recovery. The
temptation or you know you go out then to start that next 3 minute rep and
that first minute is significantly that first minute of that 3 minutes
sometimes is significantly faster because it feels easy after you’ve done
that 5k effort. So like how do you I guess make sure that you don’t cook it
early. that that three minute rep coming off the quicker 5k effort.</p>

  <p>Yeah, I think you’ve just got to be comfortable with it not being as hard</p>

  <p>and you’ve got to be patient and be a bit more disciplined there. It’s again
another thing that we practice when we train is being disciplined and
understanding pacing especially early in a rep. So you might do this session
a couple of times before you get it right. And then the one I often find the
one minute effort I go too hard because I feel like I’m let off the leash a
little bit and so instead of running 5k effort, I end up running like 3k or
1500 minute meter effort and I ruin the session that way</p>

  <p>because then minutes a minutes they’re not long enough to even to recover
before going back into a three minute.</p>

  <p>That’s it. Yeah, you and so it does take a little bit to get right, but 30
minutes isn’t that long. And especially like you should get to you could do
this out and back and You should get to halfway with this feeling pretty
good. It doesn’t normally get hard until like the fifth or fifth fourth or
fifth set.</p>

  <p>Yeah. And I think it’s sometimes good there like planning to get back further
than what you went out. We’ve gone all out at the end there. Like I’ve made
the mistake before where I’ve just got one of mine up here where we’ve kind
of hit 2:50 pace for the first minute, but then by the last one we’re hitting
2:30 pace for the last minute because we’re like one more minute to go. Let’s
just full gas it. That’s not what you want to do. You should be able to mash
the last 1 minute.</p>

  <p>Classic classic trail for 2:30</p>

  <p>2:31 pace. Yeah, we did we done 390 m in the last minute.</p>

  <p>Straight road, too. No GPS bullshit there, fellas. We did 9.3K. Anyone beat
that? I’ll give you a Patreon subscription.</p>

  <p>So, no, I wasn’t finished. Can I continue? Sorry. The trap then is then I
would pick another location to do the out and back. So, you don’t want to go,
“Oh, last time I did this, I got to that driveway in 15 minutes. This time
I’m going to fang it and get you know, 200 m past that driveway. No, no. Then
you don’t want to become obsessive with it because then even though you might
not be looking at your paces, you know where about you are on the road and
you’re going to turn that session into a bit of a race.</p>

  <p>Yep, that’s a good point.</p>

  <p>Moose, have you often like cuz like 30 minutes is like quite a long session
for some people. Have you slowly like built this up in people’s programs
where initially they might do three sets of it, then four, then five?</p>

  <p>Yeah. Yeah, I have.</p>

  <p>Start with three normally Build into it or even start instead of going three
minutes I’ll go like two minutes one minute jog and I might even just do like
30 seconds at 5k effort as well just so the volume is down I still keep the
effort levels the same like I don’t change that I either just change the
amount of reps or the duration of each rep</p>

  <p>yeah I actually also don’t mind doing three sets maybe like a week out from a
race. Like if you just want to keep in tune with two different paces without
like everything being hard or everything being a bit too easy, it’s a nice
18minute workout.</p>

  <p>Yep. It’s good for that too.</p>

  <p>Yeah, it’s it’s got a lot of flexibility this workout.</p>

  <p>And I would I know you said like that 3 minutes you’ve got in the notes here
like a 10k to half marathon pace. The first time people are doing it, it’s
better to just hit that half marathon effort or pace instead of jumping
straight into 10k effort or pace because that might you might not have a
positive experience. in the first time. Get one on the board first and then
maybe see how that pace felt and it adjust the next time you do it.</p>

  <p>Yeah. Yeah. Or even do the first two reps at half marathon effort and then
you can start to to drop it down.</p>

  <p>I’m going to say I’m going to keep saying effort here because Sorry. Yeah. I
was This one’s all about effort. Yeah.</p>

  <p>And ideally in your week, of course, you wouldn’t do this workout the day
after or the day before another workout’s planned. Like you’d follow this
with a recovery day. You’d have a recovery day before hitting it fresher.</p>

  <p>Yeah. At least one recovery day. Like we believe in two workouts a week with
a long run. And so say you do this on a Wednesday morning, then you’ll have
Thursday off, maybe Friday off as well. Not off, but just easy. And then then
you’ll do a workout Saturday.</p>

  <p>That was good fellas. I enjoyed that.</p>
</blockquote>]]></content><author><name>Ward Muylaert</name></author><category term="workout" /><summary type="html"><![CDATA[After the previous post, I was reminded that I had been meaning to look up the definition of a “Moose Fartlek”, a running workout I assume was made up by Julian “Moose” Spence of the Inside Running Podcast. A quick search spotted it in episode 223, I am mostly copying it here for my own future reference. A lot of this post is notes from listening to that part of the episode. Go listen to the source if you are interested.]]></summary></entry><entry><title type="html">What is a Hilly Run?</title><link href="https://run.wxm.be/2026/02/22/hilly-run.html" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="What is a Hilly Run?" /><published>2026-02-22T16:00:00+00:00</published><updated>2026-02-22T16:00:00+00:00</updated><id>https://run.wxm.be/2026/02/22/hilly-run</id><content type="html" xml:base="https://run.wxm.be/2026/02/22/hilly-run.html"><![CDATA[<p>My runs have been hillier than they were in Belgium, enough so that I complain
about it at times. To quantify hilliness, I have heard this formula on the
<a href="https://insiderunningpodcast.com/">Inside Running Podcast</a> by host Julian “Moose” Spence. I cannot imagine
he is the first one to come up with it, but that is my source at least.</p>

<div class="language-plaintext highlighter-rouge"><div class="highlight"><pre class="highlight"><code>elevation_in_metre / distance_in_km &gt;= 10
</code></pre></div></div>

<p>Your run is hilly if that one is true. Ran 13 km with 100 metre elevation?
100 / 13 = 7.7. Sorry, that was flat. 150 metre elevation? 11.5, that was
hilly. Does this throw out a lot of information? Yes. Is it simpler than
alternatives? Also probably yes.</p>

<p>Now the tricky thing here is what source to use for elevation, because
depending on elevation data and the smoothing applied that varies <em>a lot</em>. Over
the twoish years of using my current Garmin watch, that is the one I default to
for this calculation. Presumably Strava is pretty samesy. Note that Strava will
use your watch data unless you tell it not to, when it will override with its
own elevation data.</p>

<p>Now I wanted to make a little graph here and compare values over time. I have
my data already locally in GoldenCheetah, so I glanced at that and… realised I
cannot use the elevation data. Before I got my current watch, I believe there
was no elevation data added to the activity itself, so GoldenCheetah would fill
in those blanks using its own sources. Whatever source it uses or used for
that, however, would always give <em>way</em> more elevation gain than Garmin or
Strava assigned to an activity. So much so that I had always disregarded it
entirely. So data prior to the current watch I cannot use. I left Belgium
pretty soon after getting this current watch.</p>

<p>Eyeballing the numbers of the runs in my current location and of the few runs
when I visit family, I’d say my feeling of “I have more elevation now” is
correct, but I am too lazy to delve much deeper into a proper analysis where I
would have to somehow clean up the old data or find a different source.</p>

<p>Why did I feel the need to write out this post then, you may ask? Well, I was
not sure about that actual formula any more, so I wanted to write it down. This
post will also serve as a reminder for if I feel like checking out that
difference in hilliness again: probably not worth the effort, future me.</p>]]></content><author><name>Ward Muylaert</name></author><category term="elevation" /><summary type="html"><![CDATA[My runs have been hillier than they were in Belgium, enough so that I complain about it at times. To quantify hilliness, I have heard this formula on the Inside Running Podcast by host Julian “Moose” Spence. I cannot imagine he is the first one to come up with it, but that is my source at least.]]></summary></entry><entry><title type="html">PRTC 5000m</title><link href="https://run.wxm.be/2025/11/07/prtc-5000.html" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="PRTC 5000m" /><published>2025-11-07T20:00:00+00:00</published><updated>2025-11-07T20:00:00+00:00</updated><id>https://run.wxm.be/2025/11/07/prtc-5000</id><content type="html" xml:base="https://run.wxm.be/2025/11/07/prtc-5000.html"><![CDATA[<p>It’s… a race report? That has been forever. Running has had some highs, but
mostly lows due to a left knee patella tendon that gets annoyed too easily,
causing setbacks and just generally getting me worried about running too much
or too hard. The past maybe half year I have just been very conservative and
mostly OK though. After a small teaser at coming back to racing in August, I
got invited to join a friend’s club’s 5000m “time trial” race (that club being
the “Philadelphia Runner Track Club” or “PRTC” for short). Just a bunch of guys
and girls wanting to run fast. Sounds right up my alley, even if I am a long
way away from the shape I once was.</p>

<h2 id="training">Training</h2>

<p>The last two years have been less consistent in running, from time to time my
left knee patella tendon complained too much and I was forced to put on the
brakes, and again, and again. I think I peaked around 70–75 km of running per
week in that time with the best stretch (in terms of distance) in the last
quarter of 2024. A far cry from the 120 km I often reached before that time
period. Besides doing a parkrun somewhat faster during a long run back in
summer 2024 and some attempts at Lactate Threshold workouts later that same
year, I do not think I have really dared to run <em>fast</em> fast.</p>

<p>Back in January of this year, I had another patella tendon setback. Coming back
from that setback, my right achilles tendon suddenly complained in April. I
gave it a week or so of rest, picked up some swimming, and decided to just stay
conservative for a long while.</p>

<p>In May and June, I just ran every other day. The non running days I either went
swimming or walking. Due to running every other day, half the weeks had three
days of running, the other half had four days of running. Distance-wise I built
up from 31 and 41 km (for the three day and four day week, respectively) to 42
and 55 km (again, respectively).</p>

<p>July and the first week of August, things were a little less consistent. There
was a trip to some national parks and a trip to my family across the ocean. The
national parks involve more-than-usual walking and I have been more careful
with this kind of trip, i.e., I am letting my running take a back-seat when the
walking jumps up like that. Visiting the family involves jet lag and that sleep
confusion can really mess up your body. So there, too, I tried to be careful.
That said, I think I played it all correctly and did not push too hard. By the
end of that period I had switched to four days of running per week and about
55–60 km per week.</p>

<p>From the second week of August onwards, I felt more confident again. My body
seemed to have survived the switch to four days. I could let my life get into a
bit of a rhythm. I was running about 60 km per week. I was eager to try running
harder again. I tried a careful Lactate Threshold kind of workout (~1h race
pace), just 4×1k. Went OK but I had no clue where I was at in terms of shape,
so the workout was largely by feel and “this might be right”.</p>

<p>I signed up for a 5 km race at the end of August (the week after that LT
workout) to have an idea where I was at. Ran it probably at the maximum I could
do on that day. I finished in 18:51. Did not know how I felt about it, but at
least it was a reference point to start doing workouts more regularly. The next
week I switched to five days per week so I could have a workout day, a GA day
that wasn’t too long, and a long run day. The two other days are recovery jogs
to keep the weekly distance where I want it at, hovering near or at that 60 km
per week.</p>

<p>The week between that point and now, I stayed on that five days of running
schedule. Distance remained largely the same as I wanted to focus on dealing
with the workouts. Weekly running distance 60–62 km.</p>

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th style="text-align: left">Day</th>
      <th style="text-align: left">What</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: left">Mon</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">Walk</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: left">Tue</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">Jog (7±1 km)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: left">Wed</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">Workout (13±1 km)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: left">Thu</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">Walk</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: left">Fri</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">Run (13±1 km)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: left">Sat</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">Jog (7±1 km)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: left">Sun</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">Long run (21 km)</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

<p>I made the track my place to go mid week: Repetition (around 1500m race pace),
CV (around 30 mins race pace), and VO2max (JD says 11 mins race pace, elsewhere
also described as 3–5k race pace, but that’ll depend heavily on your speed)
were the workouts I spent time on. During this period the hot humid summer
ended and I felt stronger and stronger in the workouts. The VO2max workouts
especially gave me confidence to think my shape was closer to 18 minutes for a
5 km. I was doing those workouts at paces that should have been more tiring,
but my heart rate remained surprisingly chill.</p>

<p>Similarly, I ended up moving some of my long runs to flat and simple river
trails (Perkiomen Trail and Schuylkill River Trail for the locals). This let me
run more strictly to heart rate and get an idea of what paces sticking to my
heart rate zones gave me. It had been hard to get a view on that in the months
prior: my routes had been hilly and the weather had been too sunny, too hot,
too humid. These flat long runs in pleasant running weather at a concentrated
clip gave me extra confidence too. I seemed faster than that race in August had
indicated.</p>

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th style="text-align: right">Week</th>
      <th style="text-align: left">Workout Type</th>
      <th style="text-align: left">Workout Detail</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">18 Aug (-11)</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">LT</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">4×1 km</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">25 Aug (-10)</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">Race</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">5 km mostly flat</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">1 Sep (-9)</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">Repetition</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">3×(200, 200, 400) (goal: 41s for 200m)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">8 Sep (-8)</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">CV</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">6×800 (goal: 3:08, actual: ±2s faster, jog 200m recovery)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">15 Sep (-7)</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">CV</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">6×800 (same approach, again 2–3s too fast)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">22 Sep (-6)</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">CV</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">4×800, 1×600 (leg felt off, stopped, had been same goal)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">29 Sep (-5)</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">VO2max</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">4×1 km (3:38, :40, :42.5, :40.5, goal was :41, jog 300m recovery)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">6 Oct (-4)</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">VO2max</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">4×1 km (:35, :36, :34, :33, goal was :37)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">13 Oct (-3)</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">VO2max</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">4×1 km (:33, :33, :38, :36, goal still :37)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">20 Oct (-2)</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">Repetition</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">4×200, 3×200, 3×200 (goal: 40s for 200m, jog 200m recovery, 400m between sets)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">27 Oct (-1)</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">Repetition</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">3×(4×200) (same note as previous)</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">3 Nov</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">This Race</td>
      <td style="text-align: left">5000m</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

<p>Don’t let this overview fool you, I was not prepping for this race. I got
invited to it the week prior and it seemed like a great opportunity. That said,
I am happy enough with this preparation.</p>

<h2 id="goal-and-strategy">Goal and Strategy</h2>

<p>So when I got invited, I had to give an estimated time. The VO2max at 3:37 per
km pace still felt easier than I think VO2max should feel like. That 3:37 per
km for that workout is prescribed for people with an 18:22 5 km time (JD
tables). If it feels too easy, I should be faster than that, right? Round it up
and you get <strong>18 minutes</strong>. So I filled that in as a goal. Was I sure that I
could run that? No, not at all. In fact, it felt a bit like an optimistic
stretch goal. Not much strategy involved in aiming for that, just go for the
even split. 18:00 is 3:36 per km, 43.2 seconds per 200m, 1:26.4 per 400, 2:52.8
per 800. Remember enough of those numbers and hope for the best on the day.</p>

<h2 id="pre-race">Pre-Race</h2>

<p>The race was in the evening, which usually involves me overthinking everything
I eat all day and when I eat it. None of that today. Made sure to eat enough
oatmeal for breakfast, was hungry at lunch and ate more bread than I usually
have been eating at lunch. Had some dinner leftovers around 15:00–16:00. Drink
enough water during the day and stop early enough with it. Was an hour drive in
traffic to get there, so left around 17:00 to arrive at the track at 18:00.</p>

<p>Found the organising group on the track and got my bib (a sticker for your
chest, a sticker for your pants). Passed by the toilet. Swung my legs and hips
a bit. Jogged on the track from 18:30 onwards. Toilet again. Some more dynamic
stretches. Switched into race clothes and shoes with 12 minutes to go (19:00
start). Started some strides with 2–3 minutes to go, heading towards the other
side of the track to arrive at the start position.</p>

<p>At the start line, I found out they had organised some pacers. One of them was
was going to do 18 minutes. Perfect. We said our hellos, one other guy and a
woman also were aiming for 18:00, so we had a little group of us. With that, we
were ready to get going and all lined up.</p>

<h2 id="race">Race</h2>

<figure>
  <img src="/assets/img/20251107-prtc5000/0.avif" alt="As we are yelled into action. I am the white shirt behind the two women on the right." loading="lazy" />
  <figcaption>As we are yelled into action. I am the white shirt behind the two women on the right.</figcaption>
</figure>

<p>We were off and I quickly tucked into the inside of lane 1, right behind the
pacer. His back was going to be my view for a while. I listened to them call
out the time at the first 200m, 400m, and 800m, the pacing seemed on point. I
pressed the lap button at 1000m and indeed: 3:35.8.</p>

<p>There was some headwind on the far side (and thus probably some backwind on the
home stretch), but it was not that bad. The pacer reminded us to tuck in behind
him to have the wind blocked. I think I was still maybe half a head taller than
him, but I replied that I was trying and that it was mostly OK. I also told him
he was doing a great job, pacing us like clockwork.</p>

<p>The next five laps were uneventful. Things felt easy, sometimes feeling like I
was holding back a step to not bump into the pacer, but I also figured the
typical 5k pain could come quickly. I split at 1800 and the lap time looked
fine still. I forgot to split till 3000 and did not remember what a 1200m split
should be at. Did not bother trying to work that out and trusted the pacer.</p>

<figure>
  <img src="/assets/img/20251107-prtc5000/1800.avif" alt="Just chilling in lockstep behind the pacer." loading="lazy" />
  <figcaption>Just chilling in lockstep behind the pacer.</figcaption>
</figure>

<p>Around that 3000 mark I started thinking “OK, stopping running would be
pleasant now”. There’s that familiar feeling! I brushed the thought away by
reminding myself it was only five more laps, less than nine minutes (dividing
18 by 2 is about all the math I could deal with).</p>

<p>Our group of four (pacer, me, other guy, woman) had dwindled down to three at
some point, the woman had to leave a gap. It did not really register during the
race, I think I vaguely noticed one running shadow fewer, but it also did not
matter much to me. I was here to see my time, not to place.</p>

<p>With maybe three (or four? I don’t remember) laps to go, the other guy started
speeding up. He went around me on the straight, then around the pacer around
the very start of the turn, then stayed on the inside of lane 2 for the rest of
the turn rather than cutting back into the inner lane. I wanted to yell at him
to not run so much extra, but did not feel like I had breath to spare at that
point. I also did not bother matching the acceleration whatsoever. Again, I had
the one goal here: see whether I could go under 18 again. I still did not feel
confident about it, I really was not sure about my shape. So instead I stayed
behind the pacer, letting him keep it at a nice just below 18 min pace.</p>

<p>With like two laps to go (I am guessing here with lap counts, things just get
blurry and keeping notes is not my main focus during the race) my choice not to
follow felt vindicated as I started feeling painful stabs in my abs, slightly
right from center, slightly below the end of the ribs there. Running long with
those stabs was not going to work. I focused on switching my breathing a little
and after 200 metre the pain subsided.</p>

<p>At about 500 metre to go, on the home stretch, the pacer started slowly veering
into the second lane. I got the hint, he wanted me to start pushing for the
end. Man, this guy knows what he is doing. I slowly passed him during that home
stretch. The other guy that had tried to break away from us was still only 5–10
steps ahead of us. I don’t know when exactly I started pushing, I think I
waited till the 400 metre mark. I caught up to the other guy <em>fast</em>, went
around him, and immediately broke away again. By the middle of the turn I had a
gap already. The pacer yelled at the other guy that he should try to hold on to
me. The other guy could not. On the far side, with 250 metre to go, I reigned
in the pace a little bit, but not entirely. Things felt surprisingly acceptable
still. I was a little worried I had gone out too hot on that final lap, but the
body was not ready to call it quits yet. I kept going, leg turnover remained
OK. I pushed to the line without cracking.</p>

<figure>
  <img src="/assets/img/20251107-prtc5000/4950.avif" alt="Grimacing at the suffering in the final push down the home straight." loading="lazy" />
  <figcaption>Grimacing at the suffering in the final push down the home straight.</figcaption>
</figure>

<h2 id="results">Results</h2>

<p>(<a href="https://www.strava.com/activities/16388622737">Strava</a>)</p>

<p>Official time is 17:41, but it was all hand timed I believe, so let’s say ±1
second. They also gave a “1 mile” and “2 mile” splits in the result. I assume
they mean 1600 and 3200 metre, because getting that mile, i.e., 1609 metre,
exactly seems unlikely. With that assumption, these are the numbers from the
official results.</p>

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th style="text-align: right">Distance</th>
      <th style="text-align: right">Time</th>
      <th style="text-align: right">Lap Distance</th>
      <th style="text-align: right">Lap Time</th>
      <th style="text-align: right">Lap Pace</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">1600</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">5:43</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">1600</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">5:43</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">3:34</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">3200</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">11:27</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">1600</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">5:44</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">3:35</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">5000</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">17:41</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">1800</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">6:14</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">3:27</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

<p>I also have manual splits from my watch. “Lap Offset” compares actual lap time
to expected lap time for an 18 minute 5000m (3:36.0 per km). “400m Offset”
normalises it to a 400m distance.</p>

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th style="text-align: right">Dist</th>
      <th style="text-align: right">Time</th>
      <th style="text-align: right">Lap Dist</th>
      <th style="text-align: right">Lap Time</th>
      <th style="text-align: right">Lap Offset</th>
      <th style="text-align: right">400m Offset</th>
      <th style="text-align: right">Lap Pace</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">1000</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">3:35.8</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">1000</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">3:35.8</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">-0:00.2</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">-0:00.08</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">3:35.8</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">1800</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">6:27.6</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">800</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">2:51.8</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">-0:01.0</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">-0:00.5</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">3:34.8</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">3000</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">10:44.6</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">1200</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">4:17.0</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">-0:02.2</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">-0:01.1</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">3:34.2</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">3800</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">13:37.2</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">800</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">2:52.6</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">-0:00.2</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">-0:00.1</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">3:35.8</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">4600</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">16:27.8</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">800</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">2:50.6</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">-0:02.2</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">-0:01.1</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">3:33.3</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">5000</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">17:42.2</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">400</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">1:14.4</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">-0:12.0</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">-0:12.0</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">3:06.0</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

<p>That kick was quite strong, I might have left too much in the tank. :)</p>

<p>Oh yeah, it was a race too. There were two heats, I was in the slow heat. I was
6th out of 10 people in my heat (pacers not listed in results). The fast heat
had 21 people. It was won in 14:46 with a slowest time of 16:50. So I was 27th
out of 31. The other guy from my group finished 4 seconds behind me. The girl
from our group that wanted to go sub 18 finished in 18:04. The friend that had
invited me to this race had been aiming for sub 16:00, which might already have
been a PR for him. He blasted that goal out of the water and finished in 15:34
with a big negative split and looking in control for a lot of it. Fireball.jpg.</p>

<h2 id="musings-and-future">Musings and Future</h2>

<p>Well. My workouts will be getting a jump in intensity now. I surprised myself
today. My maybe sub 18 turned into blasting under and having some left in the
tank. It also feels nice to achieve this on just 60 km per week. I was running
twice as much before all this nonsense, though my PR was also more than a
minute faster back then. I have to learn to stop comparing myself to that
though. Those days are gone. For now.</p>

<p>Now logically I should be looking for another race a month or so from now.
Regroup, do a few workouts, aim for something faster. Find out the limit of
this shape I am in. However, we have some travel coming up later this month.
Then the end of the month after that, we are heading to my family across the
ocean. Both of these trips will mess up my running consistency a little. I
might decide on a race on a whim, but I do not dare to plan for one.</p>]]></content><author><name>Ward Muylaert</name></author><category term="report" /><category term="track" /><category term="length:5000" /><summary type="html"><![CDATA[It’s… a race report? That has been forever. Running has had some highs, but mostly lows due to a left knee patella tendon that gets annoyed too easily, causing setbacks and just generally getting me worried about running too much or too hard. The past maybe half year I have just been very conservative and mostly OK though. After a small teaser at coming back to racing in August, I got invited to join a friend’s club’s 5000m “time trial” race (that club being the “Philadelphia Runner Track Club” or “PRTC” for short). Just a bunch of guys and girls wanting to run fast. Sounds right up my alley, even if I am a long way away from the shape I once was.]]></summary></entry><entry><title type="html">American Long Dumb Shit</title><link href="https://run.wxm.be/2025/05/16/american-long-dumb-shit.html" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="American Long Dumb Shit" /><published>2025-05-16T18:00:00+00:00</published><updated>2025-05-16T18:00:00+00:00</updated><id>https://run.wxm.be/2025/05/16/american-long-dumb-shit</id><content type="html" xml:base="https://run.wxm.be/2025/05/16/american-long-dumb-shit.html"><![CDATA[<p>In my heatmapping I have the number-goes-up street and hexagon progress to
focus on. However, sometimes I just want to do something… sillier. That is
where my little adventures come into play. The ideas I lovingly refer to as my
<em>Long Dumb Shit</em>.</p>

<p>In Belgium, I would often plan these around train lines. Go to one stop, run to
the next. Repeat. Here, I do not have that luxury. Instead, I have to drive
somewhere and do a loop (or convince my wife to also waste half her day).
Progress is a little slower, but I do not mind.</p>

<h2 id="my-blob">My Blob</h2>

<figure>
  <img src="/assets/img/20250516-long-dumb-shit/blob.avif" alt="The PA blob in its current state." loading="lazy" />
  <figcaption>The PA blob in its current state.</figcaption>
</figure>

<p>Besides the obvious activity around where we live, I have been creating
tendrils vaguely in the cardinal directions. The north and then west one
follows the “Horse Shoe Trail”. East is aiming to connect Philadelphia’s center
city. South came to be from having to drop my wife off at the Wilmington train
station and evolved into another sillier idea. West was more in the process of
checking out some parks and nature areas and then wanting to hook them up. For
those north, south, and west tendrils I have further ideas. More on them later
in this post.</p>

<p>Now, there are still various loose miniblobs. Philadelphia is the most obvious
one, but I will get around to that eventually. The connection itself is easy:
there is a paved trail along the river. I figure I will be heading in that
general direction at some point and try to do it at that point.</p>

<p>The other loose miniblobs are just part of natural progress for now. Some from
races, others from checking out a different park or nature reserve, some just
from feeling like doing a few neighbourhoods of streets. I am not (yet) as
crazy about keeping every new place connected yet as I had become in Belgium. I
will connect them, at some point, no rush.</p>

<h2 id="horse-shoe-trail">Horse Shoe Trail</h2>

<!-- TODO: Add picture of the actual yellow horseshoe hanging somewhere -->

<p>The Horse Shoe Trail is a 230 km long route connecting Valley Forge to the
Appalachian Trail. I believe I first encountered this trail nearly a decade ago
by accident while running in Valley Forge. Specifically up Mount Joy and Mount
Misery there. After that, I mostly did not think about it any more for quite
some time.</p>

<figure>
  <img src="/assets/img/20250516-long-dumb-shit/hst.avif" alt="Where the Horse Shoe Trail (in red) will be taking me. Start is around the King of Prussia and Norristown text on the map's east side. The end is in the north west." loading="lazy" />
  <figcaption>Where the Horse Shoe Trail (in red) will be taking me. Start is around the King of Prussia and Norristown text on the map's east side. The end is in the north west.</figcaption>
</figure>

<p>Until the past year that is. I have been slowly chipping away at it when I am
in the mood. It was easy enough at the start, all of that is quite nearby, but
by now requires a decent bit of driving to reach my next point. I am about
halfway through it. As with all things, there is no rush. That said, this is
definitely my main Long Dumb Shit goal, time permitting.</p>

<p>One of the weirder challenges with this has been, at times, finding a
convenient place to park the car. That is partially on me, I would like to
trace the trail if possible. In other words, no matter where I park, I need to
still connect to the HST. I cannot just connect my blob in the general
direction.</p>

<p>Just as a side note for non-American readers (or non native English speakers,
perhaps): while this is called the Horse Shoe <em>Trail</em>, it is not all on trail.
The word trail evokes a certain state of the path to me. The people managing
this trail do try to get land access for that kind of path, but there are
chunks where you are running on streets rather than a beaten path. They also
have something called “rail trails” here, which, at least in my area, seems to
largely be asphalt bike and walking paths following a former train line. No
<em>trails</em> in sight.</p>

<h2 id="visiting-the-capital">Visiting the Capital</h2>

<figure>
  <img src="/assets/img/20250516-long-dumb-shit/dc-plans.avif" alt="That is a nice capital you have got down there. Circles indicate points that will get a special mention in this section. Arrows give an idea of the connections to make." loading="lazy" />
  <figcaption>That is a nice capital you have got down there. Circles indicate points that will get a special mention in this section. Arrows give an idea of the connections to make.</figcaption>
</figure>

<p>Philadelphia is nestled nicely in the middle between New York City and
Washington DC. After connecting so many things in Belgium, it seemed obvious:
connect all three together. I do not recall whether I had had this idea before or whether it
formed while I was making my Wilmington (Delaware) connection. At the very
least, the latter solidified the idea in my head.</p>

<p>This plan will be a total pain to actually get around to. It rather quickly
becomes a drive™ and, unlike with the Horse Shoe Trail, I doubt I will be able
to find nice nature running on this route.</p>

<p>Practically, I have made the focus of this idea the DC side. My wife sometimes
needs to be in DC for work, her brother lives there, there is just more chance
of us heading in that direction. I figure I might be able to sometimes squeeze
in a run when we do so. Eventually there will be some progress.</p>

<p>The very shortest route (read: definitely not the one I will be able to take)
between my blob and the one in DC is 161 km. At a rate of “maybe I will make
some progress every 6 months” (at least once the first few 10s of km of that
are done) I think this will be a very long term goal indeed. Still, a boy can
dream.</p>

<p>The distance is not even the first main hurdle to tackle here. Do you see that
big blue river there cutting through? That is the Susquehanna river and I have
to cross that. I had a look at the bridges across it and <strong>THEY ARE ALL
HIGHWAYS</strong>. Come on, America, stop hating everyone else. OK, some are
“highways”, so more like state routes, but I still could not spot sidewalks or
shoulders I would feel safe on. As I get closer, I will have a better look at
all the bridges again, but for now I only see three options:</p>

<ol>
  <li>Cross all the way in the north west of this map, at Harrisburg. Not my
preferred option. The only option that seems to actually have a sidewalk.</li>
  <li>Try crossing safely at Norman Wood Bridge / Holtwood Road, that is the
crossing you see if you start at Lancaster and follow the map straight
south. <em>Technically</em> this is supposed to be part of the “Conestoga Trail
System”, a marked trail. In reality (or at least, going by Google Maps
Streetview), it looks like a very narrow unmarked shoulder (read: a slightly
wider lane) on a bridge where I would fear for my life if I saw a truck
coming.</li>
  <li>Once a year in September (I should check up on that), there is a running
race that uses the highway bridge near Havre de Grace. That is the point
right before the river turns into a lake / bay. The plan is simple: sign up
for that with the sole purpose of crossing the river. Even if my map is not
close to it at that point, I will feel obligated to sign up just to check
that part off.</li>
</ol>

<p>For the time being, I am dismissing option one. I will get close to Harrisburg
as I continue the Horse Shoe Trail, but it is just such a far way down from
there.</p>

<p>Coincidentally, option two might be an alright option. Notice that tendril
heading due west from the blob? I was planning on connecting that to the “Enola
Low Grade Trail” a rail trail that goes further west (and eventually a bit
north). If I make that connection anyway, I can use it to connect from the
Enola Low Grade Trail down south to the Norman Wood Bridge. Cross there and
head south-south-west towards Baltimore. There seems to (eventually) be a
Baltimore light rail stop on the north end of the city that could help with
making the connection further to Baltimore proper.</p>

<p>Meanwhile, option three would see me continue the tendril that passes by
Wilmington and because of the running race would give a safe bridge passage
(which cannot be guaranteed in option two). From there, too, the plan would be
to continue to Baltimore. This one <em>might</em> be manageable depending on the exact
train coverage in this area. The plan would then be to drive down to a train
station, go to another stop, connect the two. No looping needed. I don’t know
whether the train coverage is feasible for this.</p>

<p>Both option two and three would result in me reaching Baltimore’s Camden
Station. A train station on the south side of its downtown (by the looks of the
map). There seems to be a commuter train between there and DC, but it does not
seem to run on weekends. I’ll figure that out once I get closer. Either way,
the aim would be to connect to Greenbelt: the north-east end of the green line
of the DC metro network. Once there, it’s a simple connection to what I already
have in DC.</p>

<h2 id="schuylkill-river-trail">Schuylkill River Trail</h2>

<figure>
  <img src="/assets/img/20250516-long-dumb-shit/srt.avif" alt="The Schuylkill River Trail in red. Connecting Philadelphia to Reading along the banks of the Schuylkill river." loading="lazy" />
  <figcaption>The Schuylkill River Trail in red. Connecting Philadelphia to Reading along the banks of the Schuylkill river.</figcaption>
</figure>

<p>The Schuylkill River Trail (SRT) is another bike path. I had been doing parts
of the SRT to connect down to Philadelphia, but nothing more. The SRT wasn’t a
focus. Heck if I am being honest, even connecting to Philadelphia hasn’t been
much of a focus. I just don’t feel like driving in that direction for a run
that does not sound like it will be pretty.</p>

<p>However, as I am thinking about things to list here, I would say that is a
likely candidate in terms of easier sidequests. At the very least connecting
things to Philadelphia really should happen at some point. A good chunk of the
river is also not that far from us, so it is a bit easier to get to.
Furthermore, it will finally let me get around to connecting the heatmap from
some races to the rest of my blob.</p>

<p>In case you read this and know Dutch: yes, Schuylkill is a Dutch word. I
encourage you to pronounce it that way, even if the locals won’t understand
you.</p>

<h2 id="other-side-quests-enola-low-grade-trail-conestoga-trail-perkiomen-trail">Other Side Quests: Enola Low Grade Trail, Conestoga Trail, Perkiomen Trail</h2>

<figure>
  <img src="/assets/img/20250516-long-dumb-shit/sidequests.avif" alt="The Enola Low Grade Trail (east-west), the Conestoga Trail (north-south on the west side), and the Perkiomen Trail (north-south on the east side)." loading="lazy" />
  <figcaption>The Enola Low Grade Trail (east-west), the Conestoga Trail (north-south on the west side), and the Perkiomen Trail (north-south on the east side).</figcaption>
</figure>

<p>As mentioned in the DC section, there is a trail called the Enola Low Grade
Trail that I am hoping to connect to with my west pointing tendril. Another one
I heard about is Conestoga Trail, which crosses the Enola Low Grade Trail,
crosses Norman Wood Bridge (again, see the DC section), and also on its north
end connects to the Horse Shoe Trail. Finally there is the Perkiomen Trail,
which on the other side, branching off the Schuylkill River Trail and follows
Perkiomen Creek.</p>

<p>Of these, I would say the Enola Low Grade Trail is the priority. Both for how
it will look on the map and because it will, apparently, maybe make my
connection to DC easier.</p>

<p>Once that one is complete and I have progressed enough along the Horse Shoe
Trail, I feel like Conestoga Trail might connect things nicely together. I am
not convinced about this one yet, it is more me taking notes of busy work
further down the line.</p>

<p>Finally, I believe that the Perkiomen Trail is not very long. I just need to
get in the mood to make progress on that. It does not connect me to anything I
particularly care about and it will not look particularly nice on the map, so,
ye.</p>

<h2 id="jotting-down-other-ideas">Jotting Down Other Ideas</h2>

<p><em><del>Suggestions welcome</del> Stupid ideas encouraged.</em></p>

<ul>
  <li>As briefly mentioned in the DC section, connecting to New York City would
also be nice. I just have done nothing for that nor thought it out in any
form.</li>
  <li>Connecting south east to Atlantic City (New Jersey) is something that I
sometimes wonder about. I have some runs in NJ that I would connect on the
way there and it seems like it would be a pretty straight line across NJ.</li>
  <li>I am not in any way used to camping or multiday walking. I do not have
camping gear. Anyway, walking and camping a section of the Appalachian Trail
sounds appealing. Maybe start with just a weekend?</li>
  <li>Once I have finished the Horse Shoe Trail, I might be tempted to connect it
to Harrisburg anyway.</li>
  <li>Write my name somewhere that I am unlikely to run through in the future. Make
it big enough that you cannot miss it when looking at my heatmap and having,
say, both DC and Philadelphia in view. If feeling less egocentric: draw
something. Perhaps somewhere along the DC-home route, I can draw an arrow
pointing south-west and the text “DC”. Have that on the far end of
Susquehanna. Have Philly on the near end.</li>
  <li>In Belgium, I had connected the Netherlands and France borders. Here in
Pennsylvania, I found out there is a <a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/964662#map=13/40.59336/-75.14297">Holland, New
Jersey</a>
right across the eastern border with New Jersey. There is also a <a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/153971133#map=13/40.40239/-80.49279">Paris,
Pennsylvania</a>
right before the western border with Ohio. The shortest route seems to be
about 536 km and I never have to go west like that, so chances are pretty
slim, but you know, adding it to the ideas box.</li>
  <li>Look at current map. Get to edge of heatmap. Run a vaguely circular route.
Repeat. Use it to fill in the map with runs and making it look somewhat busy.
Not sure how much I want this, but it came to mind while writing this post.</li>
</ul>

<p>The end of this post feels a bit rushed again. I was getting tired of writing
things out (planning them out is much more fun! actually running them even more
so!) and wanted to just get it out there. Apologies for any mistakes.</p>]]></content><author><name>Ward Muylaert</name></author><category term="heatmap" /><category term="long dumb shit" /><summary type="html"><![CDATA[In my heatmapping I have the number-goes-up street and hexagon progress to focus on. However, sometimes I just want to do something… sillier. That is where my little adventures come into play. The ideas I lovingly refer to as my Long Dumb Shit.]]></summary></entry><entry><title type="html">Coming to America(n Heatmapping)</title><link href="https://run.wxm.be/2025/03/23/coming-to-america.html" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="Coming to America(n Heatmapping)" /><published>2025-03-23T20:00:00+00:00</published><updated>2025-03-23T20:00:00+00:00</updated><id>https://run.wxm.be/2025/03/23/coming-to-america</id><content type="html" xml:base="https://run.wxm.be/2025/03/23/coming-to-america.html"><![CDATA[<p>Following up on <a href="/2025/01/26/end-of-belgian-heatmapping.html" title="The End of Belgian Heatmapping (26 Jan 2025)">my leaving Belgium mentioned in the last
post</a>, let us have a look at what I have been up to in
my new area. I now reside in the suburbs of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. At
least, here they refer to it as suburbs of Philadelphia. In Belgium, you would
be several cities over. For reference to fellow Belgians: the distance from the
Philadelphia city hall to our area is about the distance from the Grand Place
in Brussels to the central train station in Antwerp.</p>

<h2 id="my-vicinity">My Vicinity</h2>

<p>In my immediate area, I am just focused on getting more streets in. Evidently.</p>

<p>It is going OK so far. Nothing groundbreaking happening here, just chipping
away at it with the <a href="/2025/01/25/its-been-a-while.html" title="It's been a while (25 Jan 2025)">diminished amount of running</a> I do
nowadays.</p>

<figure>
  <img src="/assets/img/20250323-heatmap/near.activities.avif" alt="Map of my activities near me. The next three maps will use the same zoom and bounding box so you can compare more easily." loading="lazy" />
  <figcaption>Map of my activities near me. The next three maps will use the same zoom and bounding box so you can compare more easily.</figcaption>
</figure>

<p>Running here is not always ideal. This place is made for cars; pedestrians be
damned. The way to build here is often a busy road with dead end housing areas
branching off from the busy road. Such a housing area can be just one street or
it can be ten or more of them. In a housing area it is usually safe enough to
run. Many of these residential streets are like three cars wide and not that
busy. Newer ones even have sidewalks. I think they finally realised those could
be useful.</p>

<p>Going between those housing areas is often a pain though. The roads connecting
them are busy. They do not have sidewalks. Quite often they are only just two
cars wide, my guess is because this area got settled much before the
introduction of cars. If you are lucky, there is a flat grass section next to
the road that you can hop on to if a car is coming. If not… hope for the best.
Because of this, planning a running route involves a lot more thinking, a lot
more keeping track of areas to avoid, a lot of detours to get anywhere.</p>

<p>Anyway, you make do. You get where you can get. There is a decent amount of
nature, though the suburban lawns are a scourge on the earth (not to mention so
useless on hot and sunny days). There are so many big birds of prey here to
stare at in amazement. Those parts of running here are what I like.</p>

<p>With this area being so car heavy, I have also come to accept their usage
myself. In Belgium, I would have scoffed at the idea of driving somewhere to do
a run. Here, I do it as well from time to time, even just to run some streets,
not just for “adventure” runs. It just is such a pain to get to places
otherwise. That said, I find the effort of driving to places for a run also a
pain, just one I deal with from time to time.</p>

<h3 id="cities">Cities</h3>

<p>Because the roads to get places are just so dangerous to pedestrians and
because things are quite spread out, focusing on cities has not been as fun. If
you know you have to drive to get to the far side of places, it just becomes
more of a chore.</p>

<p>I still glance at their progress though. I have one “city” completed and a
handful near completion, depending on your definition of near completion. I am
not particularly focused on dragging them to completion though. Maybe once the
number of streets becomes too small to ignore.</p>

<figure>
  <img src="/assets/img/20250323-heatmap/near.cities.avif" alt="Cities near me. Percentage is the percentage completed for that city on CityStrides." loading="lazy" />
  <figcaption>Cities near me. Percentage is the percentage completed for that city on CityStrides.</figcaption>
</figure>

<p>Something I also have a look at, is my ranking in all those cities. Not many
people here are active heatmappers (on CityStrides anyway). I am first in many
low percentage cities, just due to a lack of competition. There is one guy here
that has a few places completed, otherwise there would be even more first
places in the centre of the map there. A little competition can motivate me,
though since that person has them simply completed, it is not as exciting as a
race to be the first one to complete.</p>

<figure>
  <img src="/assets/img/20250323-heatmap/near.cities.rank.avif" alt="Cities near me. Number is my rank for that city on CityStrides." loading="lazy" />
  <figcaption>Cities near me. Number is my rank for that city on CityStrides.</figcaption>
</figure>

<h3 id="hexagons">Hexagons</h3>

<p>As I had done in Belgium, the hexagon map has been my focus of completion. The
map also paints a different picture. For some cities it looked like I had
widespread progress, the hexagon map shows I have just done streets near me.</p>

<figure>
  <img src="/assets/img/20250323-heatmap/near.hexagons.avif" alt="Hexagons near me." loading="lazy" />
  <figcaption>Hexagons near me.</figcaption>
</figure>

<p>The street grid is not very dense here, so completing a single hexagon might be
easier in comparison to Brussels? Though the hexagons are also about 15% larger
in area here: 0.73 km² instead of 0.63 km² in Brussels (reminder that the earth
is a sphere). That said, progress has felt slower than in Brussels, probably
because getting to places is more of a pain.</p>

<p>My focus is on getting more green hexagons. Maybe once those really get too far
away from me, I will think more about the blue wave spreading too.</p>

<h2 id="pa-ranking">PA Ranking</h2>

<p>There is another thing I have been paying a little bit of attention to.
Citystrides has a leaderboard for the number of streets you have completed
within a region. So while I have over 13k worldwide, only a fraction of those
are completed within Pennsylvania. Currently it says I am at 2038 streets in
Pennsylvania, putting me in 21st position in the commonwealth.</p>

<p>I will probably never be first, the leader has nearly 14k streets in just
Pennsylvania. Just climbing up the ladder adds a little extra motivation
though. As with all things, the better you get, the harder the progress will
be. I need another 1500 streets to get 10th place. Doing 1500 more still will
only bump me up to 7th. For the time being, my goal is top 20. After that I
will likely aim for 12th, which puts you on the first page in Citystrides.</p>

<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th style="text-align: right">rank</th>
      <th style="text-align: right">streets in PA</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">1</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">13815</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">2</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">5847</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">3</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">5804</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">4</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">5753</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">5</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">5332</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">6</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">5314</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">7</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">5240</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">8</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">5120</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">9</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">4938</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">10</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">3544</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">11</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">3441</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">12</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">3317</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">13</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">3224</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">14</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">3127</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">15</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">2564</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">16</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">2489</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">17</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">2253</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">18</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">2253</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">19</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">2237</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">20</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">2204</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td style="text-align: right">21</td>
      <td style="text-align: right">2038</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

<h2 id="what-else">What Else?</h2>

<p>As I did in Belgium, I am working on some sillier projects here too. This blog
post was already taking too long to put out there though, so I will keep that
for a next post instead.</p>

<!--
## Fantasiekes

### HST

### DC/NYC

### Enola(?) low grade trail

### SRT?
-->]]></content><author><name>Ward Muylaert</name></author><category term="heatmap" /><category term="hexagons" /><summary type="html"><![CDATA[Following up on my leaving Belgium mentioned in the last post, let us have a look at what I have been up to in my new area. I now reside in the suburbs of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. At least, here they refer to it as suburbs of Philadelphia. In Belgium, you would be several cities over. For reference to fellow Belgians: the distance from the Philadelphia city hall to our area is about the distance from the Grand Place in Brussels to the central train station in Antwerp.]]></summary></entry><entry><title type="html">The End of Belgian Heatmapping</title><link href="https://run.wxm.be/2025/01/26/end-of-belgian-heatmapping.html" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="The End of Belgian Heatmapping" /><published>2025-01-26T18:30:00+00:00</published><updated>2025-01-26T18:30:00+00:00</updated><id>https://run.wxm.be/2025/01/26/end-of-belgian-heatmapping</id><content type="html" xml:base="https://run.wxm.be/2025/01/26/end-of-belgian-heatmapping.html"><![CDATA[<p>Dramatic clickbait title: ✓. Anyway, since I was writing things up yesterday, I
figured I would continue while I still felt in the mood for more. Life has
changed a bit for me: I moved across the Atlantic half a year ago. That means
my active heatmapping in Belgium has come to an end for the time being. I liked
expanding my Brussels domination and my silly weekend heatmap trips, but having
them require a transatlantic flight is a bridge too far for me too.</p>

<p>In this post an overview of what I had been up to in Belgium prior to leaving.</p>

<h2 id="out-with-cities-in-with-hexagons">Out With Cities, In With Hexagons</h2>

<p>After finishing Brussels, I had a bit of an issue. The cities near me stretched
out awkwardly away from Brussels.</p>

<figure>
  <img src="/assets/img/20250126-heatmap/cities-near-brussels.avif" alt="Notice how those cities form a radiant away from the completed Brussels area. Percentages signify completion in CityStrides." loading="lazy" />
  <figcaption>Notice how those cities form a radiant away from the completed Brussels area. Percentages signify completion in CityStrides.</figcaption>
</figure>

<p>I was not motivated to focus on just one of those cities, getting to their far
side was just not a simple task. What I really wanted to do was chip away at
streets nearest to me while still feeling (and seeing!) progress. Of course I
can just look for the nearest streets, complete those, carry on, but it was not
as visually appealing a way for me to go about it.</p>

<p>In came the <a href="https://h3geo.org/" title="H3 indexes points and shapes into a hexagonal grid">H3 hexagons</a> (<a href="https://www.uber.com/blog/h3/" title="H3: Uber’s Hexagonal Hierarchical Spatial Index (Uber Blog, June 2018)">announcement blog post</a>). The
idea with these is to cover the globe in hexagons and a few pentagons to make
it all fit nicely (technically the term seems to be “geospatial index”). There
are several “resolutions” of these covers: the higher the resolution, the
smaller each hexagon is. For every position on earth, it is deterministic to
which hexagon at which resolution that spot belongs.</p>

<p>What does it mean in practice? I picked a resolution (eight) that I felt made
sense to me in terms of the size of each hexagon. In Brussels, that resolution
makes each hexagon about 0.6 km² (the next resolution up or down makes this
about seven times smaller or larger). I used that resolution to cover my entire
area.</p>

<figure>
  <img src="/assets/img/20250126-heatmap/hexagons-cover-brussel.avif" alt="The center of Brussels at my chosen resolution of hexagons." loading="lazy" />
  <figcaption>The center of Brussels at my chosen resolution of hexagons.</figcaption>
</figure>

<p>For each hexagon, I want to calculate how much of it I have completed. There
are a few ways to go about this. My approach ended up taking streets from
OpenStreetMap and breaking them up in the nodes that compose them (in more GIS
terms: LineStrings and their Points). Next, it adds nodes in-between if two
nodes of a street are too far apart. So a <code class="language-plaintext highlighter-rouge">*-------*</code> becomes <code class="language-plaintext highlighter-rouge">*-*-*-*-*</code>. For
completion calculation, the approach then forgets about those streets and puts
every node in its corresponding hexagon. If I have “run a node”, i.e., a GPS
reading came close enough to the node, then the node is marked completed.
Finally, a hexagon’s completion is the percentage of its nodes that are
completed.</p>

<figure>
  <img src="/assets/img/20250126-heatmap/hexagons-completion.avif" alt="A non-started, in-progress, and completed hexagon. Black dots are incomplete nodes. I only have them appear when zoomed in far enough." loading="lazy" />
  <figcaption>A non-started, in-progress, and completed hexagon. Black dots are incomplete nodes. I only have them appear when zoomed in far enough.</figcaption>
</figure>

<p>Now, I had already completed Brussels, but I still wanted some extra work
within the city. So, eventually, I have went from considering just streets with
a name, to also including footpaths and cycleways with a name, to (after my
move away from Brussels) also including anything that is part of a hiking or
cycling route (think a GR or E route, or the ACT).</p>

<p>The final result for the greater Brussels area? Well, I cannot show you what it
looked like when I left, which was also prior to adding hiking and cycling
routes, but I can show you the current state of the map. OK I could figure out
a way to show you the state at that point, but I am not willing to make that
effort.</p>

<figure>
  <img src="/assets/img/20250126-heatmap/brussel-completion.avif" alt="The current progress in the greater Brussels area." loading="lazy" />
  <figcaption>The current progress in the greater Brussels area.</figcaption>
</figure>

<p>I have grown quite fond of this visualisation. There is a sense of achievement
for completing a hexagon. You see your green wall growing. You can figure out
the sort-of nearest incomplete hexagon easily. You can combine hexagons into a
larger sort-of hexagon that you can embiggen. I even like making my wall of
only in-progress hexagons larger, meaning I have run or walked through the
hexagon at some point. Since actively using this visualisation, I noticed I
have paid way less attention to actual city progress.</p>

<h2 id="tricountry-points">Tricountry Points</h2>

<p><a href="/2023/07/06/heatmap.html" title="Heatmap Update (6 July 2023)">On the last update</a>, I had one final tricountry point to
connect my heatmap to: the border between Belgium, Luxemburg, and Germany.
Spoiler alert: I connected that too.</p>

<figure>
  <img src="/assets/img/20250126-heatmap/tricountry.avif" alt="The connection to the final tricountry point." loading="lazy" />
  <figcaption>The connection to the final tricountry point.</figcaption>
</figure>

<p>In September 2023, a friend told me I should use his car for a weekend trip. I
decided to take the car to go do some walking in the German-speaking parts of
Belgium, as these are not as accessible by public transport. While there, I
also ended up passing by the tricountry point and connecting that up to the
village of Burg-Reuland. I had not planned this out particularly, but decided
on it while I was passing by anyway. Then I ignored the tricountry point idea
again for half a year.</p>

<p>By March 2024, I knew the clock was ticking on my move. I also knew that once
out of the country, I was unlikely to ever complete this last connection. Thus
motivated, I worked out the path I might take.</p>

<p>That March, I connected Aywaille to Verviers. I had already spent a weekend in
Aywaille once and wanted to connect my runs and walks there to the rest of my
heatmap blob. In April, I went to Aywaille again and connected it to Coo, just
north of Trois-Ponts on the map above. Coo is famous (in Belgium) for its
waterfall, some thinking it is the tallest in Belgium. Coincidentally, I had,
by accident, walked by the <a href="https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waterval_van_Reinhardstein" title="Waterval van Reinhardstein (Dutch Wikipedia)">actual tallest, but very unknown, waterfall in
Belgium</a> during my little trip in the German-speaking
part back in September 2023. In May, I connected Coo down to Vielsalm.</p>

<p>That left the connection I had been dreading. For the previous connections from
Verviers down to Vielsalm, I always went from train station to train station.
Easy enough, comfortable, pretty fast. Burg-Reuland, however, does not have a
train connection. Instead I had to take the train to Verviers, followed by a
bus going all the way down. It is lucky that at this point I was committed to
finishing things up. That May 2024, I made the trek down to Burg-Reuland, ran
back up to Vielsalm, and completed my spiderweb connection of tricountry
points.</p>

<h2 id="the-end">The End</h2>

<p>I moved out of Belgium back in June 2024 and evidently will still be passing by
my friends and family there somewhat often. Doing any special running and
walking adventures, however, will not be high on my agenda while there.</p>

<p>As such, my current heatmap of Belgium will remain stable for some time. Here
it is.</p>

<figure>
  <img src="/assets/img/20250126-heatmap/belgie.avif" alt="My current map of Belgium." loading="lazy" />
  <figcaption>My current map of Belgium.</figcaption>
</figure>

<p>I can look at that map and recall several fun moments, beautiful sights, or
memorable suffering. I would not mind thinking up more of these silly ideas
just for the memories they create. Doing these also made me more appreciative
of just being in nature for good chunks of time.</p>

<p>My new location does not make these adventures as easy (or at least, I have not
quite found my same groove yet), though I have some ideas I am slowly working
on. More on that if I hold on to this writing mood.</p>]]></content><author><name>Ward Muylaert</name></author><category term="heatmap" /><category term="hexagons" /><category term="long dumb shit" /><summary type="html"><![CDATA[Dramatic clickbait title: ✓. Anyway, since I was writing things up yesterday, I figured I would continue while I still felt in the mood for more. Life has changed a bit for me: I moved across the Atlantic half a year ago. That means my active heatmapping in Belgium has come to an end for the time being. I liked expanding my Brussels domination and my silly weekend heatmap trips, but having them require a transatlantic flight is a bridge too far for me too.]]></summary></entry><entry><title type="html">It’s been a while</title><link href="https://run.wxm.be/2025/01/25/its-been-a-while.html" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="It’s been a while" /><published>2025-01-25T15:00:00+00:00</published><updated>2025-01-25T15:00:00+00:00</updated><id>https://run.wxm.be/2025/01/25/its-been-a-while</id><content type="html" xml:base="https://run.wxm.be/2025/01/25/its-been-a-while.html"><![CDATA[<p>It’s been a while. Not the running, but my desire to write any updates. I felt
in the mood today, so jotting thoughts down on the injury that caused the loss
of desire. Warning: brain dump.</p>

<p>In August 2023 (yes, three), I was running 120 km per week. In August 2023, I
was also doing a trip in Europe that involved a lot of walking. One week was
over 80 km of walking and that does not include the walking indoor, such as
museums. By the end of August 2023, my left knee hurt. Overuse, probably.
Though I would like to add that I also, at some point prior to the left knee
pain, went on my knees to look under the bed of a rental apartment before we
were leaving, bent down all the way, and thought “that did not feel right”. I
still think about that moment.</p>

<p>I gave it a rest and took days to a week off. Things did not get better on
their own. Around mid September, I went to the kine (PT) that helped me through
my comeback from breaking my ankle. He went with the pain being overuse leading
to a badly inflamed patella tendon (a tendon at the front of the knee, just
south of the kneecap). I had a bunch of sessions with him, did more elliptical
and biking again, followed the strength routine he gave me religiously, as much
as I hated it. For the curious: lots of balancing on one leg, squats on one
leg, jumping on one leg, …</p>

<p>Things got better, slowly. Things broke down again, rapidly. Few bad nights of
sleep? Pain is back. Take an awkward step? Pain is back. Bit too intense knee
stretch (that the kine gave me)? Pain is back. It was a lot of overthinking of
every niggle in the area.</p>

<p>I was allowed to build up running again pretty swiftly. First run back was 28
September. Rest in-between runs was paramount. Run a day, two days without
running, run a day. Oddly enough I was allowed to up the distance every third
day of running. By December I was running over 20 km per run, but still taking
two off days between every run. By that point the kine had told me I could
continue on my own.</p>

<p>In the new year, I switched to three days of running. After three weeks of
that, I switched to every other day of running, then quickly switched back to
three days of running because I did not like how the knee felt. This was also
right after a trip to the USA, so my sleep was entirely messed up around that
time. Note that off days I still spent on an elliptical, a bike, or doing a
walk. On off days, I also kept up my routine of exercises the kine had given
me.</p>

<p>I stayed at three days of running per week for quite some time. Most weeks this
totalled up to around 53 km (15, 15, 23). Eventually, I settled on weekends
where I would do the long run on Saturday and a sometimes equally long walk on
Sunday. I kind of liked that setup, I managed to spend a lot of time in nature
that way. I still wished I were running more, but I coped. This continued till
the end of April 2024.</p>

<p>New May, new me, I switched to running every other day. I toned down the
weekend walking because I did not have the time any more, but kept biking
(mostly bike commute) and ellipticaling on the off days. The knee seemed to be
holding up, but from what I recall it would still randomly hurt depending on
the day.</p>

<p>Besides a transatlantic flight messing up my schedule and my sleep, June and
July were pretty consistent in continuing every other day. I was also still
doing the kine routine, I had settled on some exercises I did not hate
entirely. I also had more free time in those two months, so did more walking
again instead of elliptical. Biking was not an option.</p>

<p>August was another Euro trip. A year on from the last one, I played it a lot
safer. We did not walk as much and I definitely did not run as much. I toned it
down those weeks, squeezing in a recovery jog here-and-there. I averaged around
27 km per week for those three weeks.</p>

<p>The latter half of August I got back into the alternating days of running and
things felt fine. Mid September I switched to four days of running, totalling
about 60 km per week, and I did not fall apart.</p>

<p>At some point in September and October I think I gave up on the kine routine. I
noticed the stretching involved in it would from time to time mess up my
patella tendon. I had grown weary of it and that was the drop. I now wonder
whether that (sometimes intense) stretching was actually hurting it more. The
stretch in question was sitting on your knees and do a controlled descent of
your butt towards to heels of your foot. When I started this ordeal, I could
not come very close at all. By this point in time, I could easily sit down
entirely into the stretch, but sometimes I felt that a tiny niggle in the
patella tendon would exacerbate and hurt way more because of this move.</p>

<p>Either way, the running went well enough. I was still worrying about a bad
night of sleep or a misstep ruining things (and sometimes it did still create
small setbacks in how the knee felt), but by and large the worst seemed finally
behind me. I started more properly thinking about my future running again.</p>

<p>In November 2024, I moved to five days of running per week, hitting about
64 km. I also reintroduced doing a workout once a week. I call it Lactate
Threshold, but I do not think I am hitting that. I cannot move my legs very
fast any more, that will have to improve again over time. Still, it felt good
to create a bit of a burning lung feeling again, even if it was not all that
special. I reintroduced taking a down week every fourth week, now that it was
beginning to feel more again like I could use it.</p>

<p>December saw some more transatlantic travel, but I (and the knee) managed. In
January I switched to six days of running a week. 70 km total, three of the
days are recovery jogs.</p>

<p>I am just finishing a down week this week (and have reintroduced strides) with
my eye on running 75 km the coming weeks. Of course, yesterday I made a misstep
in a deeper patch of snow and today my left knee area hurts. Strangely enough
it is further south than (the usual pain I felt in) the patella tendon. That
will be a day off today and a reevaluation tomorrow.</p>

<p>I have noticed I am more at ease with where I am at. I still want to be fast, I
still wish I were running more, I still have hopes of running good races. I
will continue working towards those goals. However, making the decision to take
that day off today came easy. Easier than it would have before the injury. Yes
I am still annoyed with today and the past, but I am more accepting of my
situation. I do not have as much free time as I used to. I cannot run as many
different routes as I used to (for heatmap purposes, more on that if I feel
like writing another post). But I am still running. I do still love it.</p>

<p>I chug on.</p>]]></content><author><name>Ward Muylaert</name></author><category term="injury" /><summary type="html"><![CDATA[It’s been a while. Not the running, but my desire to write any updates. I felt in the mood today, so jotting thoughts down on the injury that caused the loss of desire. Warning: brain dump.]]></summary></entry><entry><title type="html">Heatmap Update</title><link href="https://run.wxm.be/2023/07/06/heatmap.html" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="Heatmap Update" /><published>2023-07-06T19:00:00+00:00</published><updated>2023-07-06T19:00:00+00:00</updated><id>https://run.wxm.be/2023/07/06/heatmap</id><content type="html" xml:base="https://run.wxm.be/2023/07/06/heatmap.html"><![CDATA[<ul id="markdown-toc">
  <li><a href="#running-all-streets" id="markdown-toc-running-all-streets">Running All Streets</a>    <ul>
      <li><a href="#brussels" id="markdown-toc-brussels">Brussels</a></li>
      <li><a href="#kraainem" id="markdown-toc-kraainem">Kraainem</a></li>
      <li><a href="#what-city-next" id="markdown-toc-what-city-next">What City Next?</a></li>
    </ul>
  </li>
  <li><a href="#long-dumb-shit" id="markdown-toc-long-dumb-shit">Long Dumb Shit</a>    <ul>
      <li><a href="#cross-belgium-north-west-to-south-east" id="markdown-toc-cross-belgium-north-west-to-south-east">Cross Belgium: North-West to South-East</a></li>
      <li><a href="#the-belgian-coast" id="markdown-toc-the-belgian-coast">The Belgian Coast</a></li>
      <li><a href="#cross-belgium-north-to-south" id="markdown-toc-cross-belgium-north-to-south">Cross Belgium: North to South</a></li>
      <li><a href="#tricountry-points" id="markdown-toc-tricountry-points">Tricountry Points</a>        <ul>
          <li><a href="#belgium-netherlands-germany" id="markdown-toc-belgium-netherlands-germany">Belgium-Netherlands-Germany</a></li>
          <li><a href="#belgium-germany-luxembourg" id="markdown-toc-belgium-germany-luxembourg">Belgium-Germany-Luxembourg</a></li>
        </ul>
      </li>
    </ul>
  </li>
  <li><a href="#future" id="markdown-toc-future">Future</a></li>
</ul>

<p>A long overdue update on my heatmapping, the previous two updates were all the
way back in <a href="/2022/01/23/heatmap-update.html" title="Heatmap Update (23 Jan 2022)">Jan 2022</a> and in <a href="/2021/05/21/heatmap-goals.html" title="Heatmap Goals (21 May 2021)">May 2021</a>.
Eighteen months have passed, so you might imagine I have made some progress.</p>

<h2 id="running-all-streets">Running All Streets</h2>

<h3 id="brussels">Brussels</h3>

<p>Done and dusted. I achieved this goal on 18 Oct 2022, being the first person to
complete Brussels, as far as I can tell. After that was completed, I still
spent some time cleaning up the map. Sometimes <a href="https://citystrides.com" title="The site I use to track my street completion and staring at my heatmap">CityStrides</a> marks a street as
complete despite you not having run properly through it. This involved checking
the map and looking for gaps in streets. I think I got everything significant.</p>

<p>Once that was done, I also ended up turning on CityStrides’ “hard mode”. It
sounds fancier than it is. When trying to complete a street, it tends to offer
you some respite from shitty GPS by counting a street completed as long as you
ran by 90% of the nodes in the street. Hard mode turns that off and requires
100% of nodes. Flipping the switch forced me to redo about 1-2% of streets in
Brussels. This was done in Feb-Mar 2023.</p>

<figure>
  <img src="/assets/img/20230706-heatmap/brussel.avif" alt="Situation in Brussels in July 2023. The blue line you can barely make out is the border of Brussels. Blame CityStrides for the bad colour choice." loading="lazy" />
  <figcaption>Situation in Brussels in July 2023. The blue line you can barely make out is the border of Brussels. Blame CityStrides for the bad colour choice.</figcaption>
</figure>

<h3 id="kraainem">Kraainem</h3>

<p>At some point after Brussels, I decided to start running the streets of
Kraainem. This city is right up against Brussels (and, I imagine, would be
<em>part</em> of Brussels in many other countries). All runs for it involved starting
from my work, running about 6 km in one direction, doing some streets, and
running the 6 km back. Kraainem is pretty small, so this was honestly finished
relatively quickly. Compared to what I was used to from Brussels anyway. :)</p>

<h3 id="what-city-next">What City Next?</h3>

<figure>
  <img src="/assets/img/20230706-heatmap/near-brussel.avif" alt="Brussels and its surrounding area in July 2023. The dark green areas without a percentage are completed." loading="lazy" />
  <figcaption>Brussels and its surrounding area in July 2023. The dark green areas without a percentage are completed.</figcaption>
</figure>

<p>I have been a bit lost in deciding what to do next. Everything requires rather
dull out and backs. The distances to get anywhere get larger and larger too.
Almost all the cities right up against Brussels also extend quite a distance
away from Brussels. Their far sides require a straight out and back long run to
reach.</p>

<p>Instead I have been chipping away at the closer parts of all of them. Just get
my completion percentages up, try to move up in the rankings of each.</p>

<p>For recovery runs on days I have some time to waste, I end up biking about
11 km to Machelen. This smaller city next to Brussels provides an easier
completion target — once I get there by other means.</p>

<p>With long enough runs from work, I can reach Drogenbos and Linkebeek. These two
“cities” are tiny, so also an easy target if I can reach them.</p>

<h2 id="long-dumb-shit">Long Dumb Shit</h2>

<p>At first the trips I had to make to get anywhere with these goals felt a little
over the top and like a bit of a time sink. But with a clear goal in mind,
i.e., making my heatmap cross Belgium, I justified their existence. At some
point in the last 18 months, however, I got sort of addicted to them. Take the
train somewhere, go for a run in a different environment, optional city
sightseeing, take the train back.</p>

<p>I now lovingly call them my “Long Dumb Shit” Adventures, since I tend to only
justify the effort for long runs.</p>

<p>To be clear, the goal here is not completing streets, just to make my heatmap
look nicer and achieve silly goals in the process.</p>

<h3 id="cross-belgium-north-west-to-south-east">Cross Belgium: North-West to South-East</h3>

<figure>
  <img src="/assets/img/20230706-heatmap/nwse.avif" alt="My Belgian heatmap after completing the North-West to South-East connection on 26 November 2022." loading="lazy" />
  <figcaption>My Belgian heatmap after completing the North-West to South-East connection on 26 November 2022.</figcaption>
</figure>

<p>This goal was the first to spark my interest. I wanted to run across Belgium.
One could do this more easily just going north to south, the shortest route.
That felt a bit boring, so instead I wanted to connect the north-western point
to the south-eastern point. That’s the Belgian-Dutch coastal border on the one
hand and the Belgian-French-Luxembourgish tricountry point on the other.</p>

<p>The work on this started in earnest around March 2022 and became a real focus
by September. The north-western side was relatively easy, the furthest I had to
go by train was about an hour. The south-eastern side was more of a time sink.
For the furthest parts the train takes around three hours. Those trips were a
bit much. The final connection was eventually made on 26 November 2022.</p>

<p>I used the train for all of these, running between stations. It helped that one
of the main lines in Belgium reaches from the coast through Brussels all the
way to Arlon (actually even to Luxembourg, capital of Luxembourg!) in the
south-east of Belgium. Once in the south-eastern side of Belgium though, I did
need some regional trains too as the distances between stations got a bit far
for what I wanted to run.</p>

<h3 id="the-belgian-coast">The Belgian Coast</h3>

<figure>
  <img src="/assets/img/20230706-heatmap/kust.avif" alt="The Belgian coast on 10 December 2022. From the French border on one end to the Dutch border on the other end." loading="lazy" />
  <figcaption>The Belgian coast on 10 December 2022. From the French border on one end to the Dutch border on the other end.</figcaption>
</figure>

<p>After the main goal, I snuck in an easy one. Running the Belgian coast might
sound like a feat if you do not know the geography, but it is only 65-70 km in
length. I had already done some parts of it too, needing just another two runs
to finish it. This was accomplished on 10 December 2022. I quite like how it
looks, but it was not much work, so it is hard to really call it an
achievement. Quite some sand running was involved, which is not the most
pleasant.</p>

<h3 id="cross-belgium-north-to-south">Cross Belgium: North to South</h3>

<figure>
  <img src="/assets/img/20230706-heatmap/ns.avif" alt="On 25 Feb 2023 I completed a North to South connection; from The Netherlands to France." loading="lazy" />
  <figcaption>On 25 Feb 2023 I completed a North to South connection; from The Netherlands to France.</figcaption>
</figure>

<p>When I came back to my Long Dumb Shit in February, I decided to make that
north-south connection after all, realising I needed just four long runs. Guess
how many weekends February has? Completed that goal by the end of the month. It
felt more like a little extra to keep busy, never a real <em>goal</em>. Yes, by this
point my weekend shenanigans had become the norm.</p>

<p>I went through Lier and Antwerpen just to connect runs there to my heatmap
blob.</p>

<h3 id="tricountry-points">Tricountry Points</h3>

<p>When I was nearing the end of my north-west to south-east connection, a
colleague said the logical next step was to do all the other corners of
Belgium. To sum them all up:</p>

<ul class="task-list">
  <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" class="task-list-item-checkbox" disabled="disabled" checked="checked" />Belgium-Netherlands-Coast: the north-west point I did.</li>
  <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" class="task-list-item-checkbox" disabled="disabled" checked="checked" />Belgium-France-Coast: other end of the coast, finished when running the
Belgian coast.</li>
  <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" class="task-list-item-checkbox" disabled="disabled" checked="checked" />Belgium-France-Luxembourg: the south-east tricountry point I did.</li>
  <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" class="task-list-item-checkbox" disabled="disabled" />Belgium-Germany-Netherlands: north-eastern point, relatively easy to reach
with a main train line from Brussels.</li>
  <li class="task-list-item"><input type="checkbox" class="task-list-item-checkbox" disabled="disabled" />Belgium-Germany-Luxembourg: eastern side of Belgium, northern tip of
Luxembourg, bit harder to reach by public transport.</li>
</ul>

<p>It’s that second to last one I eventually decided to focus on, though my mind
was not really into it. At first anyway.</p>

<h4 id="belgium-netherlands-germany">Belgium-Netherlands-Germany</h4>

<p>First weekend of May I did a first stage of this goal. A shorter forest route
connecting Verviers to Eupen, adding a little sightseeing walking around in
Eupen afterwards.</p>

<p>I then ran from Huy back to Namur, 30k of running along a
river. Not ideal for shade, but a lot better than I had expected. Also
something I accidentally did right that day: run on the side of the river where
the sun is coming from, otherwise I think you <em>also</em> get the reflection of the
sun on the water beaming against you.</p>

<p>Next another long run to connect Verviers to Liège. Ran out of energy and/or
dehydrated on this one, not sure which, leaning towards the latter. The last
few km were a struggle. A decent amount of it was in nature if I recall, so
should have been shaded enough, but my body just did not take it well that day.
A water fountain along the way that I was hoping to use was also not
operational. I think I might not have had enough water before leaving home, so
I started the run a bit dehydrated, making the water I had brought
insufficient.</p>

<p>After that came running <a href="/2023/06/01/runcation-to-aachen.html" title="Runcation to Aachen (1 Jun 2023)">from Eupen to Aachen</a>, which I talked about
before. Remember how I said I was not into this goal? Well, by this point I was
adding a weekend trip to make the connecting more pleasant.</p>

<p>All of the previous happened in May 2023. Then I took a little break from
it until the end of June when I finally got around to connecting the final
part: Huy to Liège. I had been dreading it a bit because it was also along the
river and I was not expecting much shade. Summer had started in earnest so that
was promising to not be pleasant. In the end the heat turned out alright, I
must have gotten somewhat used to things. However, I did smash the big toe of
my right foot on a rock that was jutting out and took a tumble. Some scrapes
and the toe started looking purple and blue, but ended up alright for running.
Either way, another connection made!</p>

<figure>
  <img src="/assets/img/20230706-heatmap/ne-tri.avif" alt="The Belgian look in July 2023." loading="lazy" />
  <figcaption>The Belgian look in July 2023.</figcaption>
</figure>

<h4 id="belgium-germany-luxembourg">Belgium-Germany-Luxembourg</h4>

<p>This final tricountry point one might be a goal for fall 2023. There is a train
line that goes down from Liège that should get me close. I have not quite
figured out how to go from the end of following that line to the actual
tricountry point, but I will tackle that problem when I get to it. Let’s see
what my motivation is by then.</p>

<h2 id="future">Future</h2>

<ul>
  <li>As mentioned, when it comes to city completion I am a bit all over the place
for now. Just doing streets that are in reach. Try finishing the smaller
“cities” when I have the time to reach them. This is likely to remain my
approach.</li>
  <li>The last tricountry point is a goal now. How easily I will get there remains
to be seen.</li>
  <li>When looking at it on a country scale, the map feels a bit empty. I have a
mind of filling in the gaps with my long runs when I am not in the mood to
travel half across the country. Just take public transport to somewhere
closer by, do a loop, colouring in the map as I do so. <em>Of course</em> I have to
ensure everything remains connected to the main blob in the process. I have
started some of this near Dendermonde and Lokeren, as you can see on the
final July 2023 map above.</li>
  <li>Related to the previous, I also want to get at least one finished street in
all cities near Brussels. The definition of “near” will grow larger as I make
progress with that goal.</li>
  <li>If at all possible, I want to connect every bit of heatmap I have to the main
blob. That will be more something for when an opportunity to connect it
arises.</li>
</ul>]]></content><author><name>Ward Muylaert</name></author><category term="heatmap" /><category term="citystrides" /></entry></feed>